Webb v. State, 5 Div. 241

Decision Date01 April 1975
Docket Number5 Div. 241
Citation55 Ala.App. 195,314 So.2d 114
PartiesJoe Harvest WEBB v. STATE.
CourtAlabama Court of Criminal Appeals

Guy F. Gunter, III, Opelika, for appellant.

William J. Baxley, Atty. Gen., and Donald G. Valeska, II, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

HARRIS, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of grand larceny and sentenced to ten (10) years imprisonment in the penitentiary. Prior to arraignment, he was ascertained to be indigent and counsel was appointed to represent him throughout the trial proceedings below and was appointed to represent him on appeal. At arraignment he pleaded not guilty and not guilty by reason of insanity. Trial counsel requested the court to appoint a respectable physician to conduct an examination to determine his mental condition. This request was granted and a member of the Comprehensive Mental Health Center in Opelika was appointed to make this determination. A certificate was filed with the court stating:

'As per your request an examination was made of this man by me on Tuesday, February 19, (1974). Mr. Webb was oriented as to time, place and person. He could remember events with no difficulty. In my talking with him, I could not see any evidence of a psychotic disorder. I believe that he should be held responsible for his actions.'

When the case was called for trial, appellant withdrew his special plea of not guilty by reason of insanity and went to trial on the not guilty plea.

Hudson-Thompson, Inc., a corporation, operated a grocery store in Auburn, Alabama, on December 14, 1973, under the trade name of 'Super Foods'. On the morning of that date, appellant entered the store ostensibly to buy groceries. At this particular time, business was slack and there was only one check-out cash register then in operation. On duty at the time appellant came in were the co-managers of the store and a woman cashier.

When appellant entered the store he got a grocery cart and pushed it back to the meat counter. He got a large shopping bag and began filling the bag with meat items. This attracted the manager of the non-foods department and he went to the manager of the grocery department and reported what he had observed. They both started to the back and met appellant pushing the cart toward the check-out counter. The manager saw only a lunch meat item in the basket of the cart but underneath the basket on some type of platform he saw a large shopping bag and saw meat items sticking out of the bag. The manager asked him what he had in the sack. He did not answer the question but pushed the cart to the side of an aisle and said he had left his wallet and walked out of the store. He returned in two or three minutes and a short while later he started pushing the cart through the check-out counter. Both managers of the store walked toward the front of the store and watched appellant put only the lunch meat item from the cart basket onto the counter. The cashier rang up the purchase and gave appellant some change. The large bag was still on the platform under the basket as appellant pushed the cart out the front door of the store. When he got completely out of the store and on the sidewalk, the manager asked him if he had paid for the items in the bag and he said yes, that he paid for them with a medicare card. He showed the manager the medicare card with his address in the Ridge Crest Apartments in Auburn. The manager knew the store did not accept medicare cards in payment of groceries and asked appellant to go back in the store while he checked the bag to see if there was a cashier's tape or receipt in the bag.

They returned to the meat...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Mauldin v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • 17 Julio 1979
    ...the distance the chattel was moved for slight asportation will be deemed sufficient to support a conviction of larceny. Webb v. State, 55 Ala.App. 195, 197, 314 So.2d 114, cert. denied, 294 Ala. 774, 314 So.2d 116 (1975); Tucker v. State, 50 Ala.App. 405, 408, 279 So.2d 576 (1973); Johnson ......
  • Wilkins v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • 17 Julio 1979
    ...manual control upon or about the person. If under one's power and dominion the thing is possessed. . . . " See also, Webb v. State, 55 Ala.App. 195, 314 So.2d 114, cert. denied, 294 Ala. 774, 314 So.2d 116, and cases In the instant cause, not only did Mrs. Duke describe the appellant, Jerom......
  • Oliver v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • 21 Mayo 1975
    ...314 So.2d 111 ... 55 Ala.App. 192 ... Alvin OLIVER ... 6 Div". 789 ... Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama ... May 21, 1975 ...   \xC2" ... ...
  • Taylor v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • 22 Enero 1980
    ...the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict that defendant was guilty of robbery. Golston v. State, supra; Webb v. State, 55 Ala.App. 195, 314 So.2d 114 (1975), cert. denied, 294 Ala. 774, 314 So.2d 116; Walker v. State, 43 Ala.App. 582, 196 So.2d 727 (1967), cert. denied, 280 Ala.......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT