Webb v. Watkins

Decision Date01 February 2007
Docket NumberNo. A06A2178.,A06A2178.
CitationWebb v. Watkins, 641 S.E.2d 611, 283 Ga.App. 385 (Ga. App. 2007)
PartiesWEBB v. WATKINS.
CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals

Celeste F. Brewer, Atlanta, for appellant.

Sonya Watkins, pro se.

MILLER, Judge.

Following a contempt hearing upon the application of Sonya Watkins, the trial court entered an order finding Rodney P. Webb in wilful contempt of court for failure to make child support payments pursuant to its order legitimating the child and awarding attorney fees to Watkins. On appeal, Webb contends that the foregoing findings are error. We find that evidence of record supports the trial court's finding of wilful contempt by Webb and that no statutory authority supports the trial court's award of attorney fees. Accordingly, we affirm in part and reverse in part and remand with direction.

The record shows that on July 30, 2003, Watkins filed her petition to establish paternity of her natural child born out of wedlock. Webb timely responded, admitted that he was the child's father, and requested leave of court to legitimate the child. On October 1, 2004, the trial court entered its final order on Watkins's petition, declared the child to be Webb's legitimate child, and, among other things, required Webb to pay child support in the amount of $3,000 per month, beginning November 1, 2004. Webb and Watkins then had monthly incomes of $21,666.66 and $2,500, respectively.

Shortly after the final order was entered in October 2004, Webb lost his job and fell into arrears in making the required child support payments. On June 6, 2005, Watkins filed her application for contempt, alleging that Webb owed child support in an amount exceeding $8,500. Webb denied owing that sum. Following a contempt hearing on August 26, 2005, the trial court found Webb in wilful contempt for failure to pay child support in the amount of $15,140 and ordered him to purge the contempt by paying $7,570 by October 1, 2005, and the remainder at the rate of $841.11 per month for nine months. Further, the trial court awarded Watkins her attorney fees in the amount of $2,800 and indicated that, in addition to the foregoing amounts, Webb remained liable for monthly child support payments of $3,000.

1. Webb contends that the trial court erred by finding him in wilful contempt for nonpayment of child support. We disagree.

The essence of civil contempt involved in a proceeding to enforce child support is [wilful] disobedience of a prior court order. Crowder v. Crowder, 236 Ga. 612, 225 S.E.2d 16 (1976). If there is any evidence in the record to support the trial judge's determination that a party has [wilfully] disobeyed a trial court's order, the decision of the trial court will be affirmed on appeal. Id.

( Emphasis supplied.) Pate v. Pate, 280 Ga. 796, 798(3), 631 S.E.2d 103 (2006).

Webb's failure to make court-ordered child support payments in the amount of $15,140 was undisputed in the record. The evidence otherwise showed that at the time of the contempt hearing, Webb owned a watch valued in excess of $8,000 and a home in which he had equity of more than $7,000. Other evidence showed that, in contemplation of the contempt hearing, Webb transferred to his girlfriend a one-half interest in her $1 million home which she had quitclaimed to him at the time their cohabitation began. Under these circumstances, we find that the trial court was authorized to conclude that Webb had wilfully violated his obligation to pay child support pursuant to its legitimation decree.1

2. Further, Webb contends that the trial court erred in awarding Watkins her attorney fees because it failed to state the statutory basis under which the award was made. We agree, vacate the award, and remand with direction.

"As a general rule, Georgia law does not provide for the...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
8 cases
  • Ford v. Ford
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • March 4, 2019
    ...language, the wife failed to meet her burden of showing her entitlement to the award of attorney fees. See Webb v. Watkins , 283 Ga. App. 385, 386 (2), 641 S.E.2d 611 (2007) (party seeking attorney fees bears burden of showing entitlement to them). The dissent asserts that we cannot conside......
  • Hartley v. State, A06A2324.
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • February 1, 2007
    ... ... 2 Hartley contends that his trial counsel was ineffective in that she (i) failed to request a continuance to secure Rita Carswell and Tara Watkins as witnesses to impeach Davis's testimony, (ii) failed to request a continuance on the grounds that the State had not complied with its reciprocal ... ...
  • Steed v. Steed
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • May 7, 2020
    ...the attorney fees in light of the litigation history of this case and the caliber of the attorney involved"); Webb v. Watkins , 283 Ga. App. 385, 386 (2), 641 S.E.2d 611 (2007) ("A party seeking fees must also introduce evidence of hours, rates, or some other indication of the value of the ......
  • Rimmer v. Tinch
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • September 27, 2013
    ...fees must be vacated and the case remanded for reconsideration of [the issue below].” (Citation omitted.) Webb v. Watkins, 283 Ga.App. 385, 386(2), 641 S.E.2d 611 (2007). On remand, it will be Tinch and Frix's burden to show their attorney fees and the reasonableness thereof by introducing ......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • Domestic Relations - Barry B. Mcgough and Gregory R. Miller
    • United States
    • Mercer University School of Law Mercer Law Reviews No. 59-1, September 2007
    • Invalid date
    ...Waite, 268 Ga. 115, 116, 485 S.E.2d 792, 793 (1997)). 177. Wehner v. Parris, 258 Ga. App. 772, 773, 574 S.E.2d 921, 922-23 (2002). 178. 283 Ga. App. 385, 641 S.E.2d 611 (2007). 179. Id. at 385, 641 S.E.2d at 612. 180. Id. at 386, 641 S.E.2d at 613. 181. See O.C.G.A. Sec. 19-6-2. 182. O.C.G.......