Weber v. Degenhardt
| Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
| Writing for the Court | BAY |
| Citation | Weber v. Degenhardt, 34 Mo. 458 (Mo. 1864) |
| Decision Date | 31 March 1864 |
| Parties | JULIUS N. WEBER, Respondent, v. JOHN C. DEGENHARDT, Appellant. |
Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court.
A. M. & S. H. Gardner, for respondent.
A. J. P. Garesché and Farish, for appellant.
The principal issue made by the pleadings in this case, is whether the injury sustained by the plaintiff resulted from the negligence and carelessness of defendant or his servants in piling the lumber in the alley mentioned in the petition.
The instructions given in behalf of the plaintiff substantially declare, that if the defendant caused or permitted the lumber to be piled in the alley, and that the same was not safely and securely piled, and that, while plaintiff was in or passing through the said alley, said lumber fell upon him and injured him, and that such injury was caused by the careless and unskillful manner in which said lumber was piled, and without the fault of the plaintiff, that then the jury ought to find for the plaintiff.
The defendant asked five instructions, all of which were given with the exception of the one declaring that the plaintiff was not entitled to recover.
Those given declare that it was incumbent upon the...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Claflin v. Rosenberg
...jury that a bill of exceptions cannot faithfully preserve. (State v. Anderson, 19 Mo. 241; Blumenthal v. Torini, 40 Mo. 159-60; Weber v. Degenhardt, 34 Mo. 458.) WAGNER, Judge, delivered the opinion of the court. This case was well argued, and the question is important, as it requires a def......
-
Jones ex rel. McClure v. Jones
...30 Mo. 234. The Supreme Court will not reverse or grant a new trial because the verdict is against the weight of evidence--Weber v. Degenhardt, 34 Mo. 458; Irwin v. Riddlesbarger, 29 Mo. 340; Papin v. Allen, 33 Mo. 200; Smock v. White, 28 Mo. 163; Zimmerman v. Owens, 24 Mo. 97. FAGG, Judge,......
-
Hill v. Palm
...by each party”--citing Bulkley v. Keteltas, 4 Sandf. 450; Garrison v. Pearce, 3 E. D. Smith, 255; Graff v. Barrett, 29 Pa. 477; Weber v. Degenhardt, 34 Mo. 458; Papin v. Allen, 33 Mo. 260. In Williams v. Van Meter, 8 Mo. 341, the court says: “In an action for a malicious prosecution, the pl......
- Robinson v. Hood