Weber v. Pieretti

CourtUnited States State Supreme Court (New Jersey)
Citation39 N.J. 236,188 A.2d 177
PartiesLouis WEBER et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. Joseph PIERETTI, Jr., et al., Defendants-Petitioners.
Decision Date11 February 1963

Page 236

39 N.J. 236
188 A.2d 177
Louis WEBER et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents,
v.
Joseph PIERETTI, Jr., et al., Defendants-Petitioners.
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Feb. 11, 1963.

Hellring, Lindeman & Lieberman and Norman Bruck, Newark, for petitioners.

David A. Rappeport, Bloomfield, for respondents.

Denied.

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • State v. Holland
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court – Appellate Division
    • 15 Enero 1975
    ...Weber v. Pieretti, 72 N.J.Super. 184, 178 A.2d 92 (Ch.Div.1962) aff'd 77 N.J.Super. 423, 186 A.2d 702 (App.Div.1962) certif. den. 39 N.J. 236, 188 A.2d 177 (1963); cf. Cranberry Lake Quarry Co. v. Johnson, 95 N.J.Super. 495, 231 A.2d 837 (App.Div.1967) certif. den. 50 N.J. 300, 234 A.2d 407......
  • Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., WD
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Missouri (US)
    • 6 Diciembre 1988
    ...Leimkeuhler, 329 S.W.2d 264, 271 (Mo.App.1959); Weber v. Pieretti, 72 N.J.Super. 184, 178 A.2d 92, 101[15-17] (Ch.Div.1962) cert. denied, 39 N.J. 236, 188 A.2d 77 (1963); Waeckerle v. Board of Zoning Adjustment, 525 S.W.2d 351, 359[6, 7] (Mo.App.1975); 8 McQuillin Mun.Corp. § 25.152 (3d ed.......
  • Villari v. Zoning Bd. of Adjustment of Deptford
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court – Appellate Division
    • 15 Noviembre 1994
    ...v. Pieretti, 72 N.J.Super. 184, 195, 178 A.2d 92 (Ch.Div.), aff'd o.b., 77 N.J.Super. 423, 186 A.2d 702 (App.Div.1962), certif. denied, 39 N.J. 236, 188 A.2d 177 (1963), and the statutory authorization for continuing such uses is construed restrictively. See, e.g., Avalon Home & Land Owners......
  • D'Andrea v. Guglietta
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court – Appellate Division
    • 31 Enero 1986
    ...see Weber v. Pieretti, 72 N.J.Super. 184, 178 A.2d 92 (Ch.Div.1962), aff'd 77 N.J.Super. 423, 186 A.2d 702 (App.Div.1962), certif. den. 39 N.J. 236, 188 A.2d 177 (1963); Restatement, Torts 2d § 840D at 175 (1979). On the undisputed proofs, the defense of avoidable consequences could not be ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT