Webster v. Boyer
Decision Date | 05 October 1916 |
Citation | 81 Or. 485,159 P. 1166 |
Parties | WEBSTER v. BOYER. |
Court | Oregon Supreme Court |
In Banc.
Appeal from Circuit Court, Marion County; William Galloway, Judge.
Action for injunction by Daniel Webster against U. G. Boyer. From an adverse decree, defendant appeals. Affirmed.
The complaint shows that at the general election for 1912 the plaintiff was elected justice of the peace for Salem precinct, in Marion county, and still holds said office; that at the primary nominating election held in May, 1916, R. C Wygant was nominated for justice of the peace for said precinct, and a certificate of nomination issued to him; that the defendant, the county clerk, unless restrained, will place the name of said Wygant upon the official ticket to be voted at the ensuing November election, and, as the said Wygant is the only candidate for said office, the defendant will after such election issue to him a certificate of election, thereby causing irreparable injury and interminable confusion by reason of the fact that there will be two persons each claiming to hold and exercise the duties of justice of the peace in said precinct. Other allegations not necessary to detail here appear. The prayer of the complaint is for an order enjoining defendant from placing Wygant's name upon the ballot. That part of the Constitution applicable to this case is found in sections 1 and 2, art. 7 as amended November 8, 1910, which are as follows:
* * *"
There was a demurrer to the complaint, which being overruled, and defendant refusing to plead further, there was a decree enjoining defendant from placing the name of R. C. Wygant upon the ballot, from which decree defendant appeals.
Ernest R. Ringo, Dist. Atty., of Salem, for appellant. McNary & McNary and E. M. Page, all of Salem, for respondent.
McBRIDE J. (after stating the facts as above).
Two questions are raised by the briefs upon this appeal: Is a justice's court a "court," and is a justice of the peace a "judge" within the meaning and intent of sections 1 and 2 of article 7 of the Constitution? We answer both questions in the affirmative. Sections 1 and 2 of article 7 of our original Constitution were as follows:
It will be observed that the sections as amended omit all reference to justices of the peace eo nomine, but vest judicial power in the Supreme Court and "such other courts as may from time to time be provided by law." But for the proviso in section 2 of article 7, the whole system of circuit courts county ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Kuhnhausen v. Stadelman
...take judicial knowledge of that fact. Justices of the peace are state officers in the judicial department of this state (Webster v. Boyer, 81 Or. 485, 159 P. 1166; State v. Beveridge, 88 Or. 334, 171 P. 1173), and the municipal judge of the city of Portland is ex-officio a justice of the pe......
-
Ex parte Boalt
... ... While ... it has been held that justices of the peace should be elected ... for the term of six years ( Webster v. Boyer, 81 Or ... 485, 159 P ... 1166, ... Ann. Cas. 1918D, 988), there is nothing in the language of ... the ... ...
-
State ex inf. Moore v. Farnham
... ... 429; Phy v. Wright, 75 Or ... 428, 146 P. 138, 147 P. 381; Yeaton v. Barnhart, 78 ... Or. 249, 150 P. 742, 152 P. 1192; Webster v. Boyer, ... 81 Or. 485, 159 P. 1166, Ann. Cas. 1918D, 988 ... In the ... case first cited the question was whether the ... ...
-
Fehl v. Jackson County
...in 1857, was repealed and supplanted by the 1910 amendment: Starr v. Laundry Union, 155 Or. 634, 63 P. (2d) 1104, and Webster v. Boyer, 81 Or. 485, 159 P. 1166, Ann. Cas. 1918D, 988. The county court is no longer a constitutional court: In re Will of Pittock, 102 Or. 159, 199 P. 633, 202 P.......