Weik v. South Carolina, No. 02-10101.

CourtUnited States Supreme Court
Citation539 U.S. 930
Docket NumberNo. 02-10101.
PartiesWeik v. South Carolina.
Decision Date16 June 2003
539 U.S. 930
Weik
v.
South Carolina.
No. 02-10101.
Supreme Court of United States.
June 16, 2003.

Appeal from the Sup. Ct. S. C.


Certiorari denied. Reported below: 356 S. C. 76, 587 S. E. 2d 683.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 practice notes
  • State v. Hill, No. 25868.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of South Carolina
    • September 13, 2004
    ...well as a factual understanding of the proceedings against him. State v. Weik, 356 S.C. 76, 81, 587 S.E.2d 683, 685 (2002), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 930, 123 S.Ct. 2580, 156 L.Ed.2d 609 (2003); State v. Bell, 293 S.C. 391, 395-96, 360 S.E.2d 706, 708 (1987). The defendant bears the burden of ......
  • State v. Holmes, No. 25886.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of South Carolina
    • November 1, 2004
    ...cannot complain of error which his own conduct has induced); Issue XV: State v. Weik, 356 S.C. 76, 587 S.E.2d 683 (2002), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 930, 123 S.Ct. 2580, 156 L.Ed.2d 609 (2003) (issues cannot be raised for the first time on appeal); State v. Saltz, 346 S.C. 114, 551 S.E.2d 240 (......
  • State v. Binney, No. 25920.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of South Carolina
    • January 10, 2005
    ...to his crime. See State v. Tench, 353 S.C. 531, 579 S.E.2d 314 (2003); State v. Weik, 356 S.C. 76, 587 S.E.2d 683 (2002), cert denied, 539 U.S. 930, 123 S.Ct. 2580, 156 L.Ed.2d 609 (2003); State v. Hughey, 339 S.C. 439, 529 S.E.2d 721 CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, we affirm Binney's......
3 cases
  • State v. Hill, No. 25868.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of South Carolina
    • September 13, 2004
    ...well as a factual understanding of the proceedings against him. State v. Weik, 356 S.C. 76, 81, 587 S.E.2d 683, 685 (2002), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 930, 123 S.Ct. 2580, 156 L.Ed.2d 609 (2003); State v. Bell, 293 S.C. 391, 395-96, 360 S.E.2d 706, 708 (1987). The defendant bears the burden of ......
  • State v. Holmes, No. 25886.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of South Carolina
    • November 1, 2004
    ...cannot complain of error which his own conduct has induced); Issue XV: State v. Weik, 356 S.C. 76, 587 S.E.2d 683 (2002), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 930, 123 S.Ct. 2580, 156 L.Ed.2d 609 (2003) (issues cannot be raised for the first time on appeal); State v. Saltz, 346 S.C. 114, 551 S.E.2d 240 (......
  • State v. Binney, No. 25920.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of South Carolina
    • January 10, 2005
    ...to his crime. See State v. Tench, 353 S.C. 531, 579 S.E.2d 314 (2003); State v. Weik, 356 S.C. 76, 587 S.E.2d 683 (2002), cert denied, 539 U.S. 930, 123 S.Ct. 2580, 156 L.Ed.2d 609 (2003); State v. Hughey, 339 S.C. 439, 529 S.E.2d 721 CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, we affirm Binney's......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT