Weinhagen v. Hayes
| Decision Date | 13 July 1921 |
| Citation | Weinhagen v. Hayes, 187 N.W. 756 (Wis. 1921) |
| Parties | WEINHAGEN v. HAYES ET AL. |
| Court | Wisconsin Supreme Court |
On motion to modify mandate.Motion stricken from files.
For former opinions, see178 N. W. 780;183 N. W. 162.
The motion herein on behalf of the respondent, filed June 8, 1921, while in terms a motion to modify the mandate, is in fact and substance a motion for a rehearing of a decision made on rehearing, and cannot therefore be entertained.The motion papers are stricken from the files, and the clerk is directed to remit the record forthwith.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
17 cases
-
Krzysko v. Gaudynski
...584, 594, 201 N. W. 234;Pederson v. Johnson, 169 Wis. 320, 172 N. W. 723;Weinhagen v. Hayes, 174 Wis. 233, 178 N. W. 780, 183 N. W. 162, 187 N. W. 756. Where by any species of fraud one secures title to himself in land that otherwise would have been passed to another, be becomes trustee for......
-
Fish v. White Equipment Sales & Service, Inc.
...Bank v. Koebernick (1908), 136 Wis. 473, 479, 117 N.W. 1020; Weinhagen v. Hayes (1921), 174 Wis. 233, 249, 178 N.W. 780, 183 N.W. 162, 187 N.W. 756. We have concluded that the appellant voluntarily terminated his employment. However, the question remains whether he did so 'with good cause a......
-
Mueller v. Michels
...his principal is the first duty and the highest obligation of an agent.” Weinhagen v. Hayes, 174 Wis. 233, 178 N. W. 780, 183 N. W. 162, 187 N. W. 756;Becker v. Spalinger, 174 Wis. 443, 183 N. W. 173. True, there are exceptions to this rule. An agent may serve both parties where he acts as ......
-
Wachowski v. Lutz
...comparable to that of a secret dual agency, such as was discussed in Weinhagen v. Hayes, 174 Wis. 233, 178 N. W. 780, 183 N. W. 162, 187 N. W. 756, and Mueller v. Michels (Wis.) 199 N. W. 380. It is apparent that such fraud may result in much damage or little damage. It may constitute an im......
Get Started for Free