Weintraub v. Bd. of Educ. of the City Sch. Dist. of N.Y., 10–202.

Decision Date18 October 2010
Docket NumberNo. 10–202.,10–202.
Citation178 L.Ed.2d 344,131 S.Ct. 444 (Mem),562 U.S. 995
Parties Gary N. WEINTRAUB, Administrator of the Estate of David H. Weintraub, petitioner, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF the CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT OF the CITY OF NEW YORK, et al.
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice SOTOMAYOR took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

To continue reading

Request your trial
23 cases
  • Schumann v. Dianon Sys., Inc.
    • United States
    • Connecticut Supreme Court
    • May 1, 2012
    ... ... , UroCor, which was located in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. Thereafter, in early 2003, another ... cause of action for damages against '[a]ny employer' for 'any employee' who has been ... 2007), and Weintraub v. Board of Education, 593 F.3d 196 (2d Cir.), ... ...
  • Broich v. The Inc. Vill. Of Southampton
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of New York
    • January 25, 2011
    ...by the employer." Weintraub v. Board of Education of City of New York. 593 F.3d 196, 203 (2d Cir. 2010). cert, denied. 131 S.Ct. 444, 178 L.Ed.2d 344 (2010); see also Huth. 598 F.3d at 74. A public employee speaks pursuant to his official duties if his speech was "part-and-parcel of his con......
  • Trusz v. Ubs Realty Investors, LLC
    • United States
    • Connecticut Supreme Court
    • October 13, 2015
    ...of his concerns about his ability to properly execute his duties” [internal quotation marks omitted] ), cert. denied, 562 U.S. 995, 131 S.Ct. 444, 178 L.Ed.2d 344 (2010); id., at 205(Calabresi, J., dissenting) (arguing that Garcetti“lends itself to multiple interpretations, and the majority......
  • Schumann v. Dianon Sys., Inc.
    • United States
    • Connecticut Supreme Court
    • May 1, 2012
    ...472 F.3d 794 (10th Cir.2007), and Weintraub v. Board of Education, 593 F.3d 196 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, ––– U.S. ––––, 131 S.Ct. 444, 178 L.Ed.2d 344 (2010), the defendant argues, however, that this speech was directly related to, and therefore “part and parcel” of, the plaintiff's duties ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT