Weisman v. Weisman, 61-608
Decision Date | 29 May 1962 |
Docket Number | No. 61-608,61-608 |
Citation | 141 So.2d 622 |
Parties | Isidore WEISMAN, Appellant, v. Ada WEISMAN, Appellee. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Montague Rosenberg, Miami Beach, for appellant.
William J. Piquette, Hialeah, and Kenneth L. Ryskamp, Miami, for appellee.
Before PEARSON, TILLMAN, C. J., and HORTON and BARKDULL, JJ.
Appellant-husband, defendant in the trial court, appeals a final decree of divorce and brings to this court only one point:
'Where a man's wife consciously lies to him and fraudulently induces him to sign over real property to her on the promise that she will reform and become reconciled, is the husband to be stripped of all of his assets, including his business house, because the wife had fooled him earlier?'
Assignments of error going to any other matter in the record have therefore been waived since such assignments of error as are not argued in the briefs will be deemed abandoned. Rule 3.7, subd. i, Florida Appellate Rules, 31 F.S.A. See Chaachou v. Chaachou, Fla. 1961, 135 So.2d 206; Grand Union Super Markets, Inc. v. DeAquinos, Fla.App.1961, 135 So.2d 754.
The record reveals that the appellant and the appellee are persons of mature age and have frequently found the marital road a rough one. In fact they have separated on no less than twelve occasions. After one reconciliation prior to this divorce, the husband transferred all of the property then held in his name into an estate by the entirety with his wife. This was done in order to induce his wife to return and give the marriage another try.
After the final separation, the husband filed a counterclaim to the wife's complaint for divorce, praying for a divorce and for the court to set aside the transfer of the property made to effect the reconciliation. The relief concerning the real property was prayed on the basis of an allegation that the wife had procured the transfer by her fraudulent promise to be a good wife. Proof of fraud must be clear and convincing. Biscayne Boulevard Properties, Inc. v. Graham, Fla.1953, 65 So.2d 858. Meyerson v. Boyce, Fla.App.1957, 97 So.2d 488. Here the chancellor found that fraud was not proved.
The husband's contention that the wife did not intend to make a bona fide reconciliation and thus fraudulently induced him to transfer his property is supported only by the fact that the parties did not succeed in permanently re-establishing their marriage. Under such circumstances...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Lesperance v. Lesperance
...the appellant's brief (and therefore the only point preserved for review, Chaachou v. Chaachou, Fla.1961, 135 So.2d 206; Weisman v. Weisman, Fla.App.1962, 141 So.2d 622; Central Bank and Trust Company v. Banner Trading Co., Fla.App.1963, 157 So.2d 201; Rule 3.7, subd. i, Florida Appellate R......
-
Oceania Joint Venture v. Ocean View of Miami, Ltd., 97-2629
...589, 591 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); Okeelanta Sugar Refinery, Inc. v. Maxwell, 183 So.2d 567, 569 (Fla. 4th DCA 1966); Weisman v. Weisman, 141 So.2d 622, 623 (Fla. 3d DCA 1962). We therefore must deny the Petition denied. 1 This section provides that:The supreme court shall adopt rules for the pra......
-
DHSMV v. Brandenburg, 5D04-349.
...(Fla.1961); McKinzie v. State, 845 So.2d 316 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003); State v. Schell, 211 So.2d 581 (Fla. 2d DCA 1968); Weisman v. Weisman, 141 So.2d 622 (Fla. 3d DCA 1962)(deemed waived). 2. § 316.193, Fla. Stat. 3. See § 322.2615(1)(b)1.b., Fla. Stat. 4. This commentary is not directed at th......
-
Cook v. Cook, 4-86-0086
...the trial court's finding that the deeds from the husband to the wife were void for fraud in the inducement. See Weisman v. Weisman, 141 So.2d 622 (Fla. 3d DCA 1962). In addition to setting aside the above-mentioned conveyances, the trial court set aside three deeds from the wife to Hedge H......