Weisner v. Weisner
Decision Date | 22 August 1968 |
Docket Number | 3 Div. 284 |
Citation | 282 Ala. 626,213 So.2d 685 |
Parties | Sidney WEISNER v. Camille Farrell Deutsch WEISNER et al. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Rushton, Stakely & Johnston, Montgomery, for appellant.
Calvin Whitesell, Montgomery, for appellees.
This is an appeal from a decree rendered on a petition for a declaratory judgment in the circuit court of Montgomery County, in equity.
We believe that quotations from the amended decree sustaining the demurrer and dismissing the cause sets out the pertinent facts necessary to pass upon the issues on this appeal.
'Respondent, Camille Farrell Deutsch Weisner, married Seymour Deutsch on March 29, 1950, in San Juan, Puerto Rico. At the time of this marriage, both Respondent and Deutsch were residents of the State of New York. They continued their residence in New York until February 7, 1953, when by prearrangement they, traveling on the same airplane came to Montgomery, Alabama, for the purpose of securing a divorce. This divorce was granted on February 9, 1953, and Respondent and Deutsch returned to New York on the same plane. Some short time later, Deutsch and Respondent moved into the same apartment and lived together until May of 1955. There was no pretense that they had resumed their marital status. They simply lived together. There is no contention made that either Respondent or Deutsch were ever at any time bona fide residents of the State of Alabama, and it is plain from the exhibits attached to the Bill of Complaint that they came to Alabama simply for the purpose of securing a 'quickie' divorce, and having accomplished their purpose, they returned to their home in the State of New York.
'Following these legal maneuvers in the State of New York, Complainant now files his Bill of Complaint which he entitles A Bill for Declaratory Judgment, seeking to have this court set aside the 1953 divorce between Respondent and Deutsch because of fraud and lack of jurisdiction of the Alabama courts, inasmuch as both at the time of the procurement of the divorce were residents of the State of New York.
'Respondent, by demurrer,...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Alikonis v. Alikonis
...the grounds that neither party had proper residency prior to its entry. In Yerger v. Cox,281 Ala. 1, 198 So.2d 282, and Weisner v. Weisner, 282 Ala. 626, 213 So.2d 685, it was held that in an Alabama proceeding where the parties were nonresidents, a stranger to an Alabama divorce decree cou......
-
Kingdon v. Foster
...by either the complainants or their father, the second husband, prior to the rendition of the decree.' P. 286. Weisner v. Weisner, 282 Ala. 626, 213 So.2d 685 (1968) followed Yerger v. Cox and denied collateral We conclude that the Alabama courts would not permit Mrs. Foster to now attack t......