Weissbard v. Potter Drug & Chemical Corp.

Decision Date06 March 1950
Docket NumberNo. A--98,A--98
Citation4 N.J. 115,71 A.2d 629
PartiesMax WEISSBARD et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. POTTER DRUG & CHEMICAL CORPORATION, Defendant-Respondent.
CourtNew Jersey Supreme Court

On certification to the Superior Court, Chancery Division, whose opinion is reported at 6 N.J.Super. 451.

Sanford Freedman, Newark, argued the cause for the appellants (Bilder, Bilder & Kaufman, Newark, attorneys).

Joseph H. Stamler, Newark, argued the cause for the respondent (Lorentz & Stamler, Newark, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment will be affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Freund in the Superior Court, Chancery Division, 6 N.J.Super. 451, 69 A.2d 559.

For affirmance: Chief Justice VANDERBILT, and Justices CASE, HEHER, WACHENFELD and BURLING--5.

For reversal: None.

To continue reading

Request your trial
14 cases
  • Registrar & Transfer Co. v. Director of Division of Taxation, Dept. of Treasury
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court
    • February 28, 1978
    ...the court. E. g., Weissbard v. Potter Drug & Chem. Corp., 6 N.J.Super. 451, 455-456, 69 A.2d 559 (Ch.Div.1949), aff'd per curiam 4 N.J. 115, 71 A.2d 629 (1950); Empire Trust Co. v. Commerce & Navigation Bd., 124 N.J.L. 406, 411, 11 A.2d 752 (Sup.Ct.1940). Despite this broad judicial discret......
  • Sperry & Hutchinson Co. v. Margetts, C--1626
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court
    • April 13, 1953
    ...fatally defective. They cite Weissbard v. Potter Drug & Chemical Corp., 6 N.J.Super. 451, 69 A.2d 559 (Ch.Div.1949), affirmed 4 N.J. 115, 71 A.2d 629, (1950), a case we consider wholly inapplicable to the present In view of the conclusion just reached as to plaintiff's right to maintain thi......
  • Garnick v. Serewitch
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court
    • March 1, 1956
    ...the absence of a party thereto. Weissbard v. Potter Drug & Chemical Corp., 6 N.J.Super. 451, 69 A.2d 559 (Ch.Div.1949), affirmed 4 N.J. 115, 71 A.2d 629 (1950); Finley v. Factory, etc., Ins. Co. of America, 38 N.J.Super. 390, 119 A.2d 29 (Law Div.1955). Under the language of the act and the......
  • Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. Price
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court
    • March 7, 1952
    ...Turnpike Authority v. Parsons, supra; Weissbard v. Potter Drug & Chemical Co., 6 N.J.Super. 451, 69 A.2d 559 (Ch.1949), affirmed 4 N.J. 115, 71 A.2d 629 (1950). Judgment in conformity with this opinion may be ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT