Weist v. Morlock

• Decision Date: 19 April 1898
• Court: Michigan Supreme Court
• Parties: WEIST v. MORLOCK.

74 N.W. 1012

116 Mich. 606

WEIST v. MORLOCK.

Supreme Court of Michigan

April 19, 1898

Error to circuit court, Berrien county; Orville W. Coolidge, Judge.

Action by Sophia Weist, administratrix, against Frank Morlock. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant brings error. Affirmed.

James O'Hara and Cassius M. Van Riper, for appellant.

Edward Bacon and George W. Bridgman, for appellee.

GRANT, C.J.

This case involves $300, and was tried before the court without a jury. The court made written findings of facts and law, to none of which were any exceptions taken. Several errors are assigned upon both. Under the repeated decisions of this court, the only question open for decision is whether the findings support the judgment. Upon this point there is no allegation of error, and it is not argued in the brief. It is not, therefore, open for consideration. Cook v. Burnett, 83 Mich. 251, 47 N.W. 233. We have, however, examined the findings sufficiently to hold that they support the judgment. Judgment affirmed. The other justices concurred.