Wellington v. State
| Decision Date | 22 February 1890 |
| Citation | Wellington v. State, 13 S.W. 134, 52 Ark. 447 (Ark. 1890) |
| Parties | WELLINGTON v. STATE |
| Court | Arkansas Supreme Court |
APPEAL from Washington Circuit Court, J. M. PITTMAN, Judge.
E. P Watson, for petitioner.
Motion to retax costs, quash execution, etc.For original opinion in case, seeante, p. 266.
On the affirmance of the judgment rendered against the appellant in the court below, a judgment was entered here against him, and the sureties on his supersedeas bond for 10 per cent damages.The Clerk also taxed as part of the costs in this court an attorney's fee of $ 20, to be paid to the Prosetuting Attorney, and $ 5.57 for printing the appellee's brief.A part of the costs taxed in the Circuit Court, and now complained of, is a conviction fee of $ 3.The Clerk having issued an execution for the amount of the judgment, including the damages and costs, the appellant filed a motion to recall and quash the execution and retax the costs.He also moved to modify the judgment so as to omit the recovery for damages.
Sections 2469,2471, Mansf.Dig. are as follows:
Sec. 1307, ib., provides "that the Supreme Court may make rules for the convenient dispatch of business, * * * the argument of cases or motions," etc.
Rule 23 of the Supreme Court requires that all briefs, except in certain cases, shall be printed, and provides that "the cost of printing, not to exceed fifteen dollars, a side, shall be taxed against the losing party as costs of this court."
By section 5595 Mansf.Dig. a tax of three dollars is required to be collected on each criminal conviction in courts of record.
Motion overruled.
The fee of twenty dollars taxed against the appellant is authorized by section 2469, Mansf.Dig.This section was part of the original code, approved July 22d, 1868.The same Legislature passed an act regulating fees for Prosecuting Attorneys, among other officers, which was approved July 23, 1868.
Since that time the act regulating fees has been amended, but at to the items of fees of Prosecuting Attorneys, the act of 1868 and the amendatory act of 1875 are identical, except as to the amount allowed for convictions...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Brake v. Sides
... ... cause of action, be under twenty-one years of age, or insane, ... or a married woman, or imprisoned beyond the limits of the ... State, such person shall be at liberty to bring such action ... within the time now specified by law, or in this act for ... bringing such action, after ... ...
-
Broyles v. State, CR
...punishment of the accused. Costs are awarded in order that the State may prosecute the guilty at their own expense." Wellington v. State, 52 Ark. 447, 13 S.W. 134 (1889). In a civil case we rejected a contention that the unused portion of advance costs had to be returned to the litigant rat......
-
St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co. v. Pritchard
...U. S. 73, 28 Sup. Ct. 28, 52 L. Ed. 108. It may impose a penalty on frivolous appeals prosecuted for vexation and delay. Wellington v. State, 52 Ark. 447, 13 S. W. 134. It may also, as we have already stated, impose on the losing litigant a reasonable sum as a contribution to the expense of......
-
St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. Pritchard
... ... tax of fifty cents upon each writ of summons and writ of ... execution issued out of any of the courts of record in this ... State, and ... "A ... tax of fifty cents upon the certificate of record of each ... instrument of writing recorded in any recorder's ... 73, 52 L.Ed. 108, 28 ... S.Ct. 28. It may impose a penalty on frivolous appeals ... prosecuted for vexation and delay. Wellington v ... State, 52 Ark. 447, 13 S.W. 134. It may also, as we ... have already stated, impose on the losing litigant a ... reasonable sum as a ... ...