Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Pauley

• Decision Date: 09 May 2019
• Docket Number: 525539
• Citation: 172 A.D.3d 1559,99 N.Y.S.3d 781
• Parties: WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., as Successor by Merger to Wachovia Mortgage, FSB, Formerly Known as World Savings Bank, FSB, Respondent, v. Glenn PAULEY, Also Known as Glen J. Pauley, Appellant, et al., Defendants.
• Court: New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

172 A.D.3d 1559

99 N.Y.S.3d 781

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., as Successor by Merger to Wachovia Mortgage, FSB, Formerly Known as World Savings Bank, FSB, Respondent,

v.Glenn PAULEY, Also Known as Glen J. Pauley, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

525539

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Calendar Date: March 18, 2019

Decided and Entered: May 9, 2019

Law Office of James M. Brooks, Lake Placid (Nicholas Tishler, Niskayuna, of counsel), for appellant.

Hogan Lovells US, LLP, New York City (Cameron E. Grant of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Egan Jr., J.P., Lynch, Clark, Devine and Pritzker, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Pritzker, J.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Bruening, J.), entered April 27, 2017 in Essex County, which, among other things, granted plaintiff's motion for summary judgment.

In June 2007, defendant Glenn Pauley (hereinafter defendant) and his former spouse executed a note in favor of World Savings Bank, FSB that was secured by a mortgage on certain improved real property. In 2007, the parent company of World Savings Bank, FSB merged with Wachovia Corporation and became known as Wachovia Mortgage, FSB. In 2009, Wachovia Mortgage, FSB was converted into a national bank and merged into Wells Fargo Bank, National Association. Subsequently, in November 2013, plaintiff commenced this foreclosure action. Defendant joined issue and submitted an amended answer asserting, in relevant part, that plaintiff lacked standing to maintain this action.

Following several settlement conferences held pursuant to CPLR 3408, plaintiff moved for summary judgment and the appointment of a referee. Defendant opposed the motion, in relevant part, on the grounds of standing and lack of good faith compliance with CPLR 3408. Supreme Court, as relevant here, granted plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, struck defendant's answer and ordered the appointment of a referee to compute the amount due on the note. Defendant appeals, and we affirm.

"In a foreclosure action, a plaintiff producing evidence of the mortgage, unpaid note and the mortgagor's default will be entitled to summary judgment" ( Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v. Monica, 131 A.D.3d 737, 738, 15 N.Y.S.3d 863 [2015] [internal quotations marks, brackets and citations omitted]; see Bank of N.Y. Mellon v. Slavin, 156 A.D.3d 1073, 1075, 67 N.Y.S.3d 328 [2017] ). "Where, as here, a challenge is made to the plaintiff's standing to maintain the action, the plaintiff must also demonstrate that, at the time that the action was commenced, it was the holder or assignee of the mortgage and the holder or assignee of the underlying note" (Bank of N.Y. Mellon v. Cronin, 151 A.D.3d 1504, 1505–1506, 57 N.Y.S.3d 733 [2017] [citations omitted], lv dismissed 31 N.Y.3d 1061, 77 N.Y.S.3d 329, 101 N.E.3d 970 [2018] ; see Bank of N.Y. Mellon v. Slavin, 156 A.D.3d at 1076, 67 N.Y.S.3d 328 ). Here, in addition to producing evidence of the mortgage, the unpaid note and defendant's default, plaintiff submitted an affidavit of Renee Hicks, a vice-president for plaintiff, wherein she averred, in relevant part, that, based on her review of the records maintained by plaintiff in the ordinary course of business, plaintiff is the original payee of the note by operation of merger and that plaintiff had possession of the note on or before the date the action was commenced. Additionally, plaintiff submitted documentation establishing that World Savings Bank, FSB, through mergers, ultimately became Wells Fargo Bank, National Association.¹ Banking Law establishes that a receiving corporation in a merger holds all the same rights as each corporation merged into it (see Banking Law § 602 ; PNC Bank, N.A. v. Klein, 125 A.D.3d 953, 955, 5 N.Y.S.3d 439 [2015], lv dismissed 26 N.Y.3d 1078, 23 N.Y.S.3d 155, 44 N.E.3d 231 [2015] ; Barclay's Bank of N.Y. v. Smitty's Ranch, 122 A.D.2d 323, 324, 504 N.Y.S.2d 295 [1986] ). Therefore, as Hicks' affidavit establishes plaintiff's standing by showing that it, the merged corporation, held the note at the time of commencement of the action, plaintiff has made a prima facie showing of standing, which defendant has failed to rebut (see Citimortgage, Inc. v. Espinal, 134 A.D.3d 876, 880, 23 N.Y.S.3d 251 [2015] ; PNC Bank, N.A. v. Klein, 125 A.D.3d at 955, 5 N.Y.S.3d 439 ).

Nor do we find that CPLR 3408(f) presents a bar to summary judgment. Although "the aspirational goal of CPLR 3408 negotiations is that the parties reach a mutually agreeable resolution to help the defendant avoid losing his or her home, the statute requires only that the parties enter into and conduct negotiations in good faith" ( Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Van Dyke, 101 A.D.3d 638, 638, 958 N.Y.S.2d 331 [2012] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see CPLR 3408[f] ; PNC Bank, N.A. v. Campbell, 142 A.D.3d 1147, 1147, 38 N.Y.S.3d 234 [2016] ). Here, it is undisputed that both parties took part in at least eight settlement conferences and...