Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Emanuel
Citation | 208 A.D.3d 825,172 N.Y.S.3d 624 (Mem) |
Decision Date | 24 August 2022 |
Docket Number | 2019–10318,Index No. 504962/13 |
Parties | WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., respondent, v. Vanessa EMANUEL, et al., defendants, Brooklyn Realty Plus Group Corp., appellant. |
Court | New York Supreme Court Appellate Division |
The Rosenfeld Law Office, Lawrence, NY (Avi Rosenfeld of counsel), for appellant.
Woods Oviatt Gilman LLP (Reed Smith LLP, New York, NY [Andrew B. Messite and Michael V. Margarella ], of counsel), for respondent.
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, J.P., SHERI S. ROMAN, LINDA CHRISTOPHER, WILLIAM G. FORD, JJ.
DECISION & ORDER
In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant Brooklyn Realty Plus Group Corp. appeals from a judgment of foreclosure and sale of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Noach Dear, J.), dated July 11, 2019. The judgment of foreclosure and sale, upon an order of the same court dated November 1, 2018, granting the plaintiff's motion to confirm the referee's report and for a judgment of foreclosure and sale, confirmed the referee's report and directed the sale of the subject property.
ORDERED that the judgment of foreclosure and sale is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiff commenced this action to foreclose a mortgage on certain real property in Brooklyn against, among others, the defendant Brooklyn Realty Plus Group Corp. (hereinafter Brooklyn Realty). Subsequently, the Supreme Court granted the plaintiff's motion, inter alia, for summary judgment on the complaint insofar as asserted against Brooklyn Realty and appointed a referee to compute the amount due to the plaintiff. After a hearing, at which Brooklyn Realty appeared by counsel, the referee computed the amount due to the plaintiff and issued a report accordingly. The plaintiff moved to confirm the referee's report and for a judgment of foreclosure and sale. In an order dated November 1, 2018, the court granted the plaintiff's motion. The court issued a judgment of foreclosure and sale dated July 11, 2019, confirming the referee's report and directing the sale of the property. Brooklyn Realty appeals.
"The report of a referee should be confirmed whenever the findings are substantially supported by the record, and the referee has clearly defined the issues and resolved matters of credibility" ( 33–37 Farrington, LLC v. Global Universal Group, Ltd., 165 A.D.3d 1018, 1019–1020, 87 N.Y.S.3d 302 [internal quotation marks omitted]). Contrary to Brooklyn Realty's contentions, the referee's findings with regard to the amount...
To continue reading
Request your trial- Fiorentino v. Uncle Giuseppe's of Port Wash., Inc.
-
U.S. Bank v. 292 DeKalb Assocs.
...by the record, and the referee has clearly defined the issues and resolved matters of credibility'" (Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v Emanuel, 208 A.D.3d 825, 826, quoting 33-37 Farrington, LLC v Global Universal Group, Ltd., 165 A.D.3d 1018, 1019-1020). Contrary to the defendant's contention, the ......