Wells & Richardson Co. v. Siegel, Cooper & Co.

Decision Date29 November 1900
Docket Number25,412.
Citation106 F. 77
PartiesWELLS & RICHARDSON CO. v. SIEGEL, COOPER & CO.
CourtU.S. District Court — Northern District of Illinois

Pam, Calhoun & Glennon, for defendant.

KOHLSAAT, District Judge.

In this matter I am of the opinion, from the proofs submitted herein, that while, under certain conditions, the words 'Celery Compound' could well be considered descriptive, yet the facts here shown establish the contention that they have never been used in a strictly descriptive sense, but have acquired a secondary meaning as a designation for complainant's preparation. For this reason, under the trend of the later authorities on this subject, the use of these words as a trade-mark designating this particular preparation may be properly sustained. The adoption of the representation of a head of celery as a portion of the trade-mark for this preparation is also justified by the proofs before me.

Touching the question of unfair competition in my opinion the contentions of complainant are amply sustained by a simple inspection of the bottle, carton, and inscriptions thereon used by defendant, so far as simulation is concerned.

A temporary injunction may issue restraining the use by defendant of the said trade-mark and form of package, upon complainant filing herein a proper bond in the sum of $5,000.

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • Trinidad Asphalt Mfg. Co. v. Standard Paint Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • August 11, 1908
    ... ... F. 424); 'Valvoline' to lubricating or valve oil ... ( Leonard v. Wells, 53 L. J. Ch. 233, 32 W.R. 532); ... 'Croup Tincture' ( In re Roach, 10 ... 29 Hun (N. Y.) 369); 'Celery Compound' (Wells & ... Richardson Co. v. Siegel, Cooper & Co. (C.C.) 106 F ... 77); 'Cream' ( Price ... ...
  • Rice-Stix Dry Goods Co. v. J.A. Scriven Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • November 19, 1908
    ... ... v ... Hazard, 29 Hun (N.Y.) 369); 'Celery ... Compound' (Wells & Richardson Co. v. Siegel, Cooper & ... Co. (C.C.) 106 F. 77); 'Cream' ... ...
  • American Aloe Corp. v. Aloe Creme Laboratories, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Seventh Circuit
    • February 25, 1970
    ...Pinaud, Inc. v. Huebschman, 27 F.2d 531 (E.D.N.Y.1928) (Lilas De France v. Lilas De France — for perfume); Wells & Richardson Co. v. Siegel, Cooper & Co., 106 F. 77 (N.D.Ill.1900) (Celery Compound v. Celery Compound) with Dixi-Cola Laboratories, Inc. v. Coca-Cola Co., 117 F.2d 352 (4th Cir.......
  • Computing Cheese Cutter Company v. Dunn
    • United States
    • Indiana Appellate Court
    • April 30, 1909
    ... ... (1901), 108 F. 821, 48 C. C ... A. 48, 65 L. R. A. 878; Wells & Richardson Co ... v. Siegel, Cooper & Co. (1900), 106 F. 77; ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT