Wells v. United Sav. Bank of Tecumseh

Decision Date21 December 1938
Docket NumberNo. 19.,19.
Citation286 Mich. 619,282 N.W. 844
PartiesWELLS v. UNITED SAVINGS BANK OF TECUMSEH.
CourtMichigan Supreme Court

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Action by Stanley B. Wells against the United Savings Bank of Tecumseh, Michigan, to recover a sum of money representing building and loan association stock which plaintiff allegedly assigned to defendant to apply on plaintiff's indebtedness to a Federal land bank. From a judgment for defendant notwithstanding verdict for plaintiff, plaintiff appeals.

Affirmed.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Lenawee County; G. Arthur Rathbun, judge.

Argued before the Entire Bench, except BUTZEL, J.

Walter M. Nelson, of Detroit, for appellant.

Charles L. Robertson, of Adrian, for appellee.

POTTER, Justice.

Plaintiff sued defendant to recover $1,275 and $225 interest thereon, a total of $1,500. There was verdict for plaintiff and judgment for defendant notwithstanding. Plaintiff appeals.

Plaintiff alleges that from the estate of his father he became the owner of $1,550 in stock in the American Building & Loan Association, of Jackson; that March 19, 1934, he assigned this stock to defendant to apply on plaintiff's indebtedness to the Federal Land Bank, of St. Paul, $1,000 at par, and $550 at fifty cents on a dollar; that defendant refused to pay or credit $1,275 on the Federal Land Bank mortgage against plaintiff or to pay plaintiff the same, to his damage. Plaintiff's declaration also relies upon all of the common counts in assumpsit. Defendant appeared and denied all the material allegations of plaintiff and claimed to have become the owner of the stock in question in pursuance of a written assignment set forth in its answer by which it apparently took title to said stock absolutely; that July 14, 1933, plaintiff owed defendant $4,000 as principal on a mortgage given by plaintiff, and interest thereon from January 6, 1931, at six per cent; that a loan was granted plaintiff by said Federal Land Bank in the sum of $2,500, and by the Land Bank commissioner in the sum of $1,000; that there was delivered to defendant Federal Land Bank bonds of the value of $2,613.38 and checks for $162.27, out of which defendant was instructed by plaintiff to pay, and did pay, claims against plaintiff in the sum of $398.28; that defendant credited on the mortgage note $1,550, the par value of said building and loan stock and the proceeds of the funds received from the Federal Land Bank, of St. Paul, less the amounts paid out for the benefit of plaintiff, making a total credit of $3,927.37, leaving a balance due on the principal of the mortgage of $72.62; that thereafter defendant sold the American Building & Loan stock in the open market for $922.25, resulting in a loss of $627.75, and that plaintiff was indebted to defendant at the time of the settlement by defendant with the representative of the Federal Land Bank commissioner in the additional sum...

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
  • Rheault v. Lufthansa German Airlines
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Michigan
    • September 15, 1995
    ...individually and was not hired by the partnership to handle the matter that the third parties presented. In Wells v. United Savings Bank, 286 Mich. 619, 282 N.W. 844 (1938) and Peoples State Bank v. Bloch, 249 Mich. 99, 227 N.W. 778 (1929), the Michigan Supreme Court held that an attorney h......
  • Capital Dredge and Dock Corp. v. City of Detroit, 84-1173
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit
    • March 19, 1986
    ...individually and was not hired by the partnership to handle the matter that the third parties presented. In Wells v. United Savings Bank, 286 Mich. 619, 282 N.W. 844 (1938) and Peoples State Bank v. Bloch, 249 Mich. 99, 227 N.W. 778 (1929), the Michigan Supreme Court held that an attorney h......
  • Estes (State Report Title: State Bar Grievance Administrator v. Estes), In re
    • United States
    • Michigan Supreme Court
    • December 18, 1973
    ...96 A.L.R.2d 823.3 In addition to the two cases specifically cited for this proposition Infra, see also Wells v. United Savings Bank of Tecumseh, 286 Mich. 619, 622, 282 N.W. 844 (1938); Peoples State Bank for Savings v. Bloch, 249 Mich. 99, 104--106, 227 N.W. 778 (1929); Fetz v. Leyendecker......
  • Coates v. Drake
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US
    • March 16, 1984
    ...N.W. 100 (1909) ]; Peoples State Bank v Bloch, 249 Mich 99 [, 227 N.W. 778 (1929) ]; and most recently in Wells v United Savings Bank of Tecumseh, 286 Mich 619 [, 282 N.W. 844 (1938) ]." 374 Mich. 147, 132 N.W.2d 75. (Footnote See also Michigan Nat'l Bank of Detroit v. Patmon, 119 Mich.App.......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT