Wells v. Wells
| Decision Date | 03 December 1963 |
| Court | Connecticut Supreme Court |
| Parties | Lucille C. WELLS v. Selden E. WELLS, Jr. Supreme Court of Errors of Connecticut |
Harry Hammer, Rockville, for appellant (plaintiff).
Paul B. Groobert, Manchester, for appellee (defendant).
The appearing that the plaintiff in the above-entitled case has failed to prosecute her appeal from the Superior Court in Tolland County with proper diligence, it is ordered that the appeal be and hereby is dismissed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
4 cases
-
State v. McCarthy
...is filed, it is being prosecuted or defended with proper diligence. See Greene v. Cavedon, 161 Conn. 593, 281 A.2d 824; Wells v. Wells, 151 Conn. 728, 197 A.2d 943; Tuozzolo v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 151 Conn. 727, 197 A.2d 942 (appeals dismissed suo motu); State v. Stanley, 157 Conn. 625......
-
Chanosky v. City Bldg. Supply Co.
...in Tuozzolo v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 151 Conn. 727, 197 A.2d 942, Tkaczyk v. Levine, 151 Conn. 728, 197 A.2d 942, Wells v. Wells, 151 Conn. 728, 197 A.2d 943, and State v. Fenster, 151 Conn. 729, 197 A.2d 944. An important element in that determination is the number, extent and merit of ......
- Tkaczyk v. Gallagher
- Tkaczyk v. Levine