Welton v. Poynter

Decision Date21 May 1897
Citation96 Wis. 346,71 N.W. 597
PartiesWELTON v. POYNTER ET AL.
CourtWisconsin Supreme Court

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Appeal from circuit court, Richland county; George Clementson, Judge.

Action by O. S. Welton against Elizabeth A. Poynter and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.Miner & Miner and L. H. Bancroft, for appellant.

F. W. Burnham, for respondents.

WINSLOW, J.

This is an action of ejectment for a piece of farm land about 5 rods in width and 15 rods in length. The question is really one of the location of the boundary line between the plaintiff and defendants. The plaintiff's lands are west of, and immediately adjoining, the defendants' lands. The plaintiff's line on the east, according to his deed and the deeds of all his grantors for nearly 30 years, is a north and south line 8 rods east of a certain quarter-section line. For the same length of time this line has been supposed to be marked by a fence which stands 8 rods east of a line which for the same length of time, and probably longer, has been reputed to be the said quarter-section line. The occupation of the plaintiff and his grantors for nearly 30 years has been up to this fence, and no further, without controversy. Other conveyances of land in the same and the adjoining quarter section have been made with reference to this reputed quarter-section line, and fences built in accordance therewith, which have stood many years, and still stand. There is no evidence as to the existence of any stakes or bearing trees, or other monuments showing the original location of the line. In 1895 a survey was made by the county surveyor, and he testified that he located the line five rods east of its ancient reputed location; but he does not state how he located it, from what point he started, or whether he...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Daniel R. Northrop v. Opperman
    • United States
    • Wisconsin Supreme Court
    • February 3, 2011
    ...of fact unless they are clearly erroneous. Wis. Stat. § 805.17(2).26 ¶ 43 The survey/fence analysis is demonstrated in Welton v. Poynter, 96 Wis. 346, 71 N.W. 597 (1897), in which a fence line that existed for 30 years was thought to mark the boundary line. A survey was performed under whic......
  • Peter H. and Barbara J. Steuck Living Trust v. Easley
    • United States
    • Wisconsin Court of Appeals
    • May 13, 2010
    ...139 (1915); Brew v. Nugent, 136 Wis. 336, 117 N.W. 813 (1908); Wollman v. Ruehle, 104 Wis. 603, 80 N.W. 919 (1899); Welton v. Poynter, 96 Wis. 346, 71 N.W. 597 (1897); and Toby v. Secor, 60 Wis. 310, 19 N.W. 99 ...
  • Nagel v. Philipsen
    • United States
    • Wisconsin Supreme Court
    • May 6, 1958
    ...152 N.W. 139; Brew v. Nugent, 1908, 136 Wis. 336, 117 N.W. 813; Wollman v. Ruehle, 1899, 104 Wis. 603, 80 N.W. 919; Welton v. Poynter, 1897, 96 Wis. 346, 71 N.W. 597; and Toby v. Secor, 1884, 60 Wis. 310, 19 N.W. 99. 6 Thompson, Real Property, p. 483, sec. 3301, states: 'The acquiescence or......
  • Wunnicke v. Dederich
    • United States
    • Wisconsin Supreme Court
    • April 13, 1915
    ...probably 50 years, should be taken as fixing the correct boundaries of the tract. Tobey v. Secor, 60 Wis. 310, 19 N. W. 99;Welton v. Poynter, 96 Wis. 346, 71 N. W. 597;Bishop v. Bleyer, 105 Wis. 330, 81 N. W. 413;Wollman v. Ruehle, 100 Wis. 31, 75 N. W. 425;Id., 104 Wis. 603, 80 N. W. 919;B......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT