Wenborne-Karpen Dryer Co. v. Cutler Dry Kiln Co., Inc.
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit |
| Citation | Wenborne-Karpen Dryer Co. v. Cutler Dry Kiln Co., Inc., 292 F. 861 (2nd Cir. 1923) |
| Decision Date | 18 June 1923 |
| Docket Number | 279. |
| Parties | WENBORNE-KARPEN DRYER CO. v. CUTLER DRY KILN CO., Inc., et al. |
Before ROGERS, HOUGH, and MANTON, Circuit Judges.
We are presented with a petition for rehearing and what is called a petition for intervention. We have examined the petition for rehearing and are not disposed to entertain it in substance but we are regretfully compelled to refuse it even admission to our files.
The form of criticism adopted, and the manner in which what may fairly be called accusations are made, are not in accord with the code of professional manners hitherto recognized in this court. Of the names appended to the petition, but one is that of a member of this bar, and, knowing the professional activities of the signers, we exonerate that one man of personal responsibility for the form of the petition. The petition is denied and the clerk is directed to refuse filing thereto.
As to the petition for intervention, the petitioner shows no reason...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Smith v. American Asiatic Underwriters
...15 How. 10, 12, 14 L.Ed. 578; Thomson Houston Electric Co. v. Western Electric Co., 2 Cir., 158 F. 813; Wenborne-Karpen Dryer Co. v. Cutler Dry Kiln Co., 2 Cir., 292 F. 861; Morin v. Stuart, 5 Cir., 112 F.2d 585. We have not been asked to remand the case with directions to the China court t......
-
Wenborne-Karpen Dryer Co. v. Dort Motor Car Co.
...Judge Hazel, sustained the patent. 285 F. 73. Upon appeal, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals held the patent to be invalid. 290 F. 625; 292 F. 861. After the favorable decision by the district court at Buffalo, and pending the appeal therefrom, plaintiff brought this suit against the Dort......
-
Western Air Lines v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 12867.
...Green, 221 Ala. 415, 129 So. 69, 71. For this reason intervention in an appellate court is inappropriate. Wenborne-Karpen Dryer Co. v. Cutler Dry Kiln Co., 2 Cir., 292 F. 861; The William Bagaley, 5 Wall. 377, 411-412, 18 L.Ed. Because the proceedings before us are limited to a review of th......
-
Lucas v. Central Missouri Trust Co.
... ... filing of such papers. In Wenborne-Karpen Dryer Co. v ... Cutler Dry Kiln Co., 292 F. 861, a United ... ...