Wendt v. Horowitz
| Decision Date | 13 June 2002 |
| Docket Number | No. SC00-389.,SC00-389. |
| Citation | Wendt v. Horowitz, 822 So.2d 1252 (Fla. 2002) |
| Parties | Bernard WENDT, Petitioner, v. Marvin HOROWITZ, et al., Respondents. |
| Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
351 cases
-
In re Chinese-Manufactured Drywall Prods. Liab. Litig.
...to commit a tortious act within this state, a defendant's physical presence in Florida is not required," id.(citing Wendt v. Horowitz, 822 So. 2d 1252, 1260 (Fla. 2002)), as subsection (b) also applies to "defendants committing tortious acts outside the state that cause injury in Florida." ......
-
In re Chinese Manufactured Drywall Prods. Liab. Litig.
...to commit a tortious act within this state, a defendant's physical presence in Florida is not required,” id. (citing Wendt v. Horowitz, 822 So.2d 1252, 1260 (Fla.2002)), as subsection (b) also applies to “defendants committing tortious acts outside the state that cause injury in Florida.” P......
-
Searcy v. Parex Res., Inc.
...the lack of allegations and evidence that any part of the claim originates from the Officers' conduct in Texas”).31 Cf. Wendt v. Horowitz, 822 So.2d 1252, 1260 (Fla.2002) (recognizing a tort can occur within Florida under the state's long-arm statute “through the nonresident defendant's tel......
-
Lewis v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC
...‘whether the allegations of the complaint state a cause of action.’ " PVC Windoors, Inc. , 598 F.3d at 808 (quoting Wendt v. Horowitz , 822 So. 2d 1252, 1260 (Fla. 2002) ). Therefore, the Court must first determine whether Plaintiffs’ FDUTPA and unjust enrichment claims are subject to dismi......
Get Started for Free
3 firm's commentaries
-
Family Law: Corporate and Trust Challenges to Service of Process and Jurisdiction
...requisite minimum contacts, and plaintiff stepmother filed no response or affidavits refuting stepson’s attestations); Wendt v. Horowitz, 822 So. 2d 1252, 1254 (Fla.2002); WH Smith, PLC v. Benages & Associates, Inc., 51 So. 3d 577, 582-83 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010); Marina Dodge, Inc. v. Quinn, 134......
-
Family Law: Corporate and Trust Challenges to Service of Process and Jurisdiction (Updated)
...requisite minimum contacts, and plaintiff stepmother filed no response or affidavits refuting stepson’s attestations); Wendt v. Horowitz, 822 So. 2d 1252, 1254 (Fla.2002); WH Smith, PLC v. Benages & Associates, Inc., 51 So. 3d 577, 582-83 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010); Marina Dodge, Inc. v. Quinn, 134......
-
Family Law: Corporate And Trust Challenges To Service Of Process And Jurisdiction
...quash service or dismiss, the court likely will derive facts from the affidavits, transcripts, and other records. See Wendt v. Horowitz, 822 So. 2d 1252, 1254 (Fla.2002);WH Smith, PLC v. Benages & Associates, Inc., 51 So. 3d 577, 582-83 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010); See also Venetian Salami Co. v. Pa......
2 books & journal articles
-
Domestic violence
...can establish personal jurisdiction without the need that the defending party have a physical presence in Florida. [ Wendt v. Horowitz , 822 So. 2d 1252 (Fla. 2002).] However, there must be a sworn allegation to support that respondent knew that petitioner was present in Florida at the time......
-
2-3 Due Process Considerations
...Brand in Costa Rica. The contact requirement can be met by telephonic contact, e-mail or written communication alone. Wendt v. Horowitz, 822 So.2d 1252, 1252 (Fla. 2002). F & C hired Torrealba and Cersosimo, who continued to represent the Florida Defendants. F & C argues it has no direct co......