Wenzel v. Zantop Air Transport, Inc., A--937

Decision Date19 October 1967
Docket NumberNo. A--937,A--937
Citation97 N.J.Super. 264,235 A.2d 29
PartiesLawrence R. WENZEL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. ZANTOP AIR TRANSPORT, INC., Respondent-Respondent.
CourtNew Jersey Superior Court — Appellate Division

On appeal from the Union County Court, Law Division, whose opinion is reported in 94 N.J.Super. 326, 228 A.2d 104.

John W. Devlin, Plainfield, for appellant (O'Brien, Devlin & Shaw, Plainfield, attorneys).

Andrew Lawrie, East Orange, for respondent (Lawrie & Jennings, East Orange, attorneys).

Before Judges CONFORD, COLLESTER and LABRECQUE.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment dismissing petitioner's claim for workmen's compensation benefits for lack of jurisdiction is affirmed for the reasons expressed by Judge Weidenburner in his opinion reported at 94 N.J.Super. 326, 228 A.2d 104 (Cty.Ct.1967).

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Phillips v. Oneida Motor Freight, Inc.
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court — Appellate Division
    • November 1, 1978
    ...the Union County Court in Wenzel v. Zantop Air Transport, Inc., 94 N.J.Super. 326, 335, 228 A.2d 104 (1967), aff'd o.b. 97 N.J.Super. 264, 235 A.2d 29 (App.Div.1967), to the effect that In the light of the instructions from our appellate courts to give a liberal interpretation to coverage u......
  • Loeb v. Loeb
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • November 6, 1967
  • Iowa Beef Processors, Inc. v. Miller
    • United States
    • Iowa Supreme Court
    • November 25, 1981
    ...513, 232 N.W.2d 166 (1975); Wenzel v. Zantop Air Transport, Inc., 94 N.J.Super. 326, 228 A.2d 104 (Union County Ct.), aff'd, 97 N.J.Super. 264, 235 A.2d 29 (1967); Ray v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 517 S.W.2d 194 In the present case there is no meaningful link between Miller's domicile in......
  • Anesthesia Assocs. of Morristown v. Weinstein Supply Corp.
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court — Appellate Division
    • October 7, 2020
    ...with [AAM] in New Jersey. Citing to Wenzl v. Zantop Air Transport Inc., 94 N.J. Super. 326, 334 (Law Div.), aff'd o.b., 97 N.J. Super. 264 (App. Div. 1967) (explaining that an employee's in-state domicile alone, without any employment contacts, is insufficient to confer jurisdiction in New ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT