Werner v. Hofmann
Decision Date | 30 September 1993 |
Docket Number | No. 93-2008ND,93-2008ND |
Citation | 5 F.3d 1170 |
Parties | Bankr. L. Rep. P 75,476 Harlan WERNER; Mary Werner, Appellants, v. Willis D. HOFMANN; Bonnie L. Hofmann, Appellees. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit |
Daniel J. Chapman, Bismarck, ND, argued, for appellants.
Lawrence P. Kropp, Jamestown, ND, argued, for appellees.
Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.
This dispute arises from a dairy cattle lease agreement between Harlan and Mary Werner and Willis D. and Bonnie L. Hofmann. When the Werners terminated the lease, the Hofmanns failed to return the correct number of cattle and the Werners sued the Hofmanns in North Dakota state court on theories of fraud, conversion, and breach of contract. The state court made no findings concerning fraud or conversion, but ruled in the Werners' favor on contract grounds and awarded a $33,247 judgment. The Hofmanns then filed a Chapter 7 bankruptcy petition and the Werners objected to discharge of the judgment debt on grounds of fraud, embezzlement, larceny, and willful and malicious injury. See 11 U.S.C. Sec. 523(a)(4), (a)(6) (1988). The bankruptcy court held the debt was dischargeable, Werner v. Hofmann (In re Hofmann), 144 B.R. 459 (Bankr.D.N.D.1992), and the district court affirmed. We agree with the district court that no error of fact or law appears in the bankruptcy court's decision.
The statutory exceptions to discharge in bankruptcy are narrowly construed, and the creditor opposing discharge must prove the debt falls within an exception to discharge. Belfry v. Cardozo (In re Belfry), 862 F.2d 661, 662 (8th Cir.1988). The Werners first invoke Sec. 523(a)(4), which excepts from discharge a debt arising from the debtor's "fraud or defalcation while acting in a fiduciary capacity, embezzlement, or larceny." Finding the agreement between the Werners and the Hofmanns did not create a fiduciary relationship, the bankruptcy court correctly held that the fraud or defalcation exception did not apply. See Barclays Am./Business Credit, Inc. v. Long (In re Long), 774 F.2d 875, 878-79 (8th Cir.1985) ( ). The embezzlement exception requires that the debtor improperly used the creditor's property before complying with some obligation to the creditor. Belfry, 862 F.2d at 663. Here, the lease agreement did not call for the Hofmanns to segregate or refrain from using the Werners' cattle. Also, the bankruptcy court's finding that the disagreement over the number of cattle to be returned to the Werners was due to "many years of inaccurate cattle herd counts and the lack of [an]...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
In re Hathaway
...aff'd, 152 F.3d 919 (2d Cir. 1998)); Werner v. Hofmann (In re Hofmann), 144 B.R. 459, 464 (Bankr.D.N.D. 1992), aff'd, 5 F.3d 1170 (8th Cir.1993)). Neither an embezzlement nor larceny must occur to require the debtor was acting in a fiduciary capacity for the purposes of 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(4......
-
In re Stone
... ... nondischargeability must prove ... § 523(a)(3).) ... § 523(a)(4) Werner v. Hofmann, 5 F.3d 1170, ... 1172 (8th Cir.1993) (The creditor ... opposing discharge must prove ... ...
-
In re McKnew
...the taking. In re Davis, 262 B.R. at 671 (citing Werner v. Hofmann (In re Hofmann), 144 B.R. 459, 464 (Bankr. D.N.D.1992), aff'd, 5 F.3d 1170 (8th Cir. 1993)); Gore v. Kressner (In re Kressner), 155 B.R. 68, 73-74 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y.1993), aff'd, 152 F.3d 919 (2d Cir.1998). Neither an embezzlem......
-
Webb v. Isaacson (In re Isaacson)
...see also Zio Johnos, Inc. v. Ziadeh (In re Ziadeh), 284 B.R. 893, 899 (Bankr.N.D.Iowa 2002) (citing Werner v. Hofmann, 5 F.3d 1170, 1172 (8th Cir.1993)) (“A mere contractual relationship is less than what is required to establish the existence of a fiduciary relationship.”). Courts have fou......
-
DEBTOR EMBEZZLEMENT OF COLLATERAL.
...for which it was entrusted)") (quoting Bryant v. Tilley (In reTilley), 286 B.R. 782, 789 (Bankr. Colo. 2002)0. (48) Werner v. Hoffman, 5 F.3d 1170, 1172 (8th Cir. 1993) (looking to a lease agreement to determine if the debtor had obligations to segregate or refrain from using property); See......
-
Determining Congressional Intent Regarding Dischargeability of Imputed Fraud Debts in Bankruptcy - Theresa J. Pulley Radwan
...57 F.3d 342, 346 (3d Cir. 1995); Century 21 Balfour Real Estate v. Menna (In re Menna), 16 F.3d 7, 9 (1st Cir. 1994); Werner v. Hoffman, 5 F.3d 1170, 1172 (8th Cir. 1993); Goldberg Sec., Inc. v. Scarlata (In re Scarlata), 979 F.2d 521, 524 (7th Cir. 1992)). 24. A "debtor" includes any "pers......