Wertman v. Mich. Mut. Liab. Co.

Decision Date04 June 1934
Docket NumberNo. 52.,52.
Citation267 Mich. 508,255 N.W. 418
PartiesWERTMAN v. MICHIGAN MUT. LIABILITY CO.
CourtMichigan Supreme Court

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Appeal from Circuit Court, Genesee County, in Chancery; James S. Parker, Judge.

Action by Mae C. Wertman, administratrix of the estate of Harvey E. Wertman, deceased, against the Michigan Mutual Liability Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

Reversed.

Argued before the Entire Bench, except BUSHNELL, J.

L. J. Carey and Geo. J. Cooper, both of Detroit, for appellant.

Doran & Pearson, of Flint, for appellee.

WIEST, Justice.

This is an action on an accident insurance policy. We quote the following from the stipulated facts:

‘On July 6, 1932, about the hour of six P. M. he (the insured) was the owner, and was operating, a Chevrolet coupe with a light trailer attached, going in a southerly direction on the Clio road in Genesee county, about a half mile north of Pearson road. He was alone at the time, having delivered some lumber to a location on the Clio road, and was returning to his home in Flint. As he was proceeding along the highway some papers which he had in his car slipped to the floor, and he thought one of them had blown out, and he put his head out of the left side window of the car and looked back up the road; while thus momentarily looking back, his car veered off to the right side of the highway and ran into a shallow ditch, striking a Consumers Power Company pole, carrying high tension wires, which pole was about six feet off the highway. The impact broke the pole completely off, one of the wires broke and fell with one end laying over the car and/or trailer, and the other end on the ground in the grass, under the car. The right front end of the car struck the pole. After the collision the car was completely off the pavement about a foot from the edge.

‘Deceased (the insured) got out of the left door of the car. About five people had gathered at the scene, saw the deceased walk across the pavement and stand around a few minutes talking to some of the bystanders and telling them about the papers slipping off the seat, thinking one had blown out, and his looking back outside to see, and then his car going off the road. He appeared shocked and pale to most of the bystanders, and all right to others.

‘The end of the wire on the ground apparently set the grass on fire right under the motor. Deceased started toward the car and some of the bystanders shouted a warning not to touch the car, but he...

To continue reading

Request your trial
22 cases
  • Allstate Ins. Co. v. Freeman
    • United States
    • Michigan Supreme Court
    • July 18, 1989
    ...to belabor the point. I would therefore apply the exclusion in its plain and easily understood sense. Wertman v. Michigan Mutual Liability Co., 267 Mich. 508, 510, 255 N.W. 418 (1934). To apply the exclusion in its plain and easily understood sense, we need only determine whether Gravenmier......
  • Upjohn Co. v. New Hampshire Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • Michigan Supreme Court
    • October 17, 1991
    ...it must be considered "in its plain and easily understood sense." 432 Mich. at 710, 443 N.W.2d 734. See Wertman v. Michigan Mutual Liability Co., 267 Mich. 508, 510, 255 N.W. 418 (1934). We find persuasive the recent opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit which......
  • Auto-Owners Ins. Co. v. Churchman
    • United States
    • Michigan Supreme Court
    • September 9, 1992
    ...a subjective intent; thus, the exclusion must be applied in its plain and easily understood sense. Wertman v. Michigan Mut. Liability Co., 267 Mich. 508, 510, 255 N.W. 418 (1934). Looking at the available facts of this case, we know that Mr. Frost left his home, stating his intentions. We a......
  • Mondou v. Lincoln Mut. Cas. Co.
    • United States
    • Michigan Supreme Court
    • February 25, 1938
    ...of an insurance policy is not ambiguous, no construction, in the usual sense of the word, is called for. Wertman v. Michigan Mutual Liability Co., 267 Mich. 508, 255 N.W. 418;Indemnity Ins. Co. v. Geist, 270 Mich. 510, 259 N.W. 143. A contract will be construed so as to give effect to every......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT