Wesley v. United States

Decision Date16 October 1967
Docket NumberNo. 21178.,21178.
Citation384 F.2d 100
PartiesCharlie Bob WESLEY, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit

Harry J. Kreamer, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.

Edwin L. Miller, U. S. Atty., Shelby Gott, Asst. U. S. Atty., San Diego, Cal., for appellee.

Before MERRILL and ELY, Circuit Judges, and BYRNE, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

There was ample evidence to support appellant's conviction of forgery. His opportunity rendered him a natural object of suspicion. His identification as the forger by the Government's handwriting expert was convincing, and he offered no rebuttal expert testimony.

There is no support whatsoever for appellant's contention that the trial judge demonstrated bias.

Appellant's constitutional rights were not violated when handwriting exemplars were secured from him. Gilbert v. State of California, 388 U.S. 263, 266-267, 87 S.Ct. 1951, 18 L.Ed.2d 1178 (1967).

Affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • People v. Stuller
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • August 14, 1970
    ...263, 266--267, 87 S.Ct. 1951, 18 L.Ed.2d 1178; Lewis v. United States, 127 U.S.App.D.C. 269, 382 F.2d 817, 818--819; Wesley v. United States, 9 Cir., 384 F.2d 100, 101.) Defendant correctly asserts that where fingerprints are obtained in violation of constitutional rights, such as where the......
  • United States ex rel. Harris v. Hendrick
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Pennsylvania
    • June 17, 1969
    ...1926, 18 L.Ed.2d 1149 (1967); Lewis v. United States, 127 U.S.App.D.C. 269, 382 F.2d 817 (1967) and specifically Wesley v. United States, 384 F.2d 100 (9th Cir. 1967); Weaver v. United States, 379 F.2d 799 (8th Cir. 1967); Granza v. United States, 381 F.2d 190 (5th Cir. 1967) and United Sta......
  • U.S. v. Hernandez, s. 683
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • March 23, 1984
    ...would support an inference of intent to defraud, but see United States v. Marshall, 431 F.2d 944 (5th Cir.1970); Wesley v. United States, 384 F.2d 100 (9th Cir.1967), because Ana's signing of a false endorsement was not the only evidence bearing on intent that was before the jury, and Judge......
  • Rosenfield v. Kay Jewelry Stores, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit
    • September 16, 1968
    ... ... KAY JEWELRY STORES, INC., Appellee ... United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit ... September 16, 1968.        R. C. Jopling, Jr., ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT