West Chicago Street Railroad Company v. People of the State of Illinois City of Chicago
Decision Date | 09 April 1906 |
Docket Number | No. 241,241 |
Citation | 26 S.Ct. 518,201 U.S. 506,50 L.Ed. 845 |
Parties | WEST CHICAGO STREET RAILROAD COMPANY, Plff. in Err. , v. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS ex rel. CITY OF CHICAGO |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Messrs. John P. Wilson and Charles S. Babcock for plaintiff in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 507-511 intentionally omitted] Messrs. James Hamilton Lewis and Granville W. Browning for defendant in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 511-513 intentionally omitted] Mr. Justic
e Harlan delivered the opinion of the court:
This case presents some questions of jurisdiction and constitutionality arising out of the relative rights and duties of the city of Chicago and the West Chicago Street Railroad Com- pany in respect of a tunnel maintained by that company under the south branch of Chicago river at or near Van Buren street, in that city.
The judgment in the circuit court of Cook county, Illinois, was in favor of the railroad company, but it was reversed in the appellate court, first district, the former court being directed to give to the city the relief asked. Upon appeal to the supreme court of Illinois a judgment was rendered in favor of the city.
The contention of the company is that the judgment under review cannot be sustained consistently either with the contract clause of the Constitution of the United States or with the due process of law enjoined by the 14th Amendment.
The case presented by the record is substantially as will be now stated.
On or about April 2d, 1888, the city council of Chicago adopted in due form the following ordinance:
When this ordinance was passed there was in force what is known as the horse and dummy act, passed in 1874, which provided: 'That any company which has been or shall be incorporated under the general laws of this state, for the purpose of constructing, maintaining, or operating any horse or dummy railroad or tramway, may enter upon and appropriate any property necessary for the construction, maintenance, and operation of its road, and all necessary siding, side tracks, and appurtenances, and may, subject to the provisions contained in this act, locate and construct its road upon or over any street, alley, road, or highway, or across or over any waters in this state, in such manner as not to unnecessarily obstruct the public use of such street, alley, road, or highway, or interrupt the navigation of such waters.'
In 214 Ill. 9, 19, 73 N. E. 393, 396, the supreme court of Illinois, referring to this act, said:
The tunnel was completed by the railroad company in March, 1894, and has ever since been used and is now being used as a passageway under the river for its cars. When constructed (as well as at the present time) the water in the south branch of the Chicago river over the tunnel, near Van Buren street, varied in depth from 17 to 18 3-10 feet.
On the 3d day of March, 1899, Congress passed a river and harbor act, among the provisions of which was one directing the Secretary of War to cause surveys to be made and the cost of improving certain rivers and harbors to be estimated and reported to Congress, as follows: 'Improving Chicago river in Illinois: Survey and estimate of cost for a channel twenty-one feet deep from its mouth to the stock yards, on the south branch, and to Belmont avenue, on the north branch, so far as may be permitted by existing docks and wharves, exclusive of cost of removing or constructing bridges or piers or lowering tunnels; and the aforesaid depth of twenty-one feet is hereby adopted as the project depth for the improvement in lieu of that fixed by the act of June third, eighteen hundred and ninety-six [29 Stat. at L. 202, chap. 314]; Provided, That all the work of removing and reconstructing bridges and piers and lowering tunnels necessary to permit a practicable channel with said depth to be obtained shall be done, or caused to be done, by the city of Chicago, without expense to the United States.' 30 Stat. at L. 1156, chap. 425.
After the passage of that act steps were taken to dredge the Chicago river so as to deepen its channel in accordance with the provisions of the act of Congress, and, it is alleged, such work 'has been proceeding under the authority and supervision of the government of the United States, for the purpose of providing a sufficiently deep channel for the uses and purposes of commerce and navigation as aforesaid.'
For the purpose of obeying the act of Congress, and in order to obtain a free and unobstructed navigation of the Chicago river for the benefit of commerce, interstate and domestic, the city council of Chicago, on the 19th day of March, 1900, duly passed the following ordinance: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Philadelphia Company v. Henry Stimson
...R. Co. v. Illinois, 200 U. S. 561, 50 L. ed. 596, 26 Sup. Ct. Rep. 341, 4 A. & E. Ann. Cas. 1175; West Chicago Street R. Co. v. Illinois, 201 U. S. 506, 50 L. ed. 845, 26 Sup. Ct. Rep. 518; Union 51 L. ed. 523, 27 Sup. Ct. Rep. 367; Monongahela 51 L. ed. 523, 27 Sup. Ct Rep. 367; Monongahel......
-
Owen v. U.S., 87-1405
...1083 (1913) (no compensation for loss of use of a navigable channel bed for oyster cultivation); West Chicago Street R.R. v. Illinois, 201 U.S. 506, 26 S.Ct. 518, 50 L.Ed. 845 (1906) (no compensation for removal of tunnel passing under navigable stream); Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Ry. v. ......
-
State v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.
... ... PAUL & SAULT STE. MARIE RAILWAY COMPANY, a Corporation No. 1905 Supreme Court of North ... 23 Minn. 114; Carli v ... Stillwater Street R. & Transfer Co. 28 Minn. 373, 41 Am ... Rep ... Gough, 23 N.J.L. 624; Delaplaine v. Chicago" & N.W. R. Co. 42 Wis. 214, 24 Am. Rep. 386 ... \xC2" ... & Q. R. Co. v ... Illinois, 200 U.S. 561, 50 L.Ed. 596, 26 S.Ct. 341, 4 ... Close, 35 Iowa ... 570; Abbott v. Kansas City, St. J. & C. B. R. Co. 83 ... Mo. 276, 53 Am ... 160; ... Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co. v. People, 212 Ill. 109, 72 ... N.E. 219; Chicago & N.W ... U.S. 453, 49 L.Ed. 831, 25 S.Ct. 471; West Chicago Street ... R. Co. v. Illinois, 201 U.S ... 364; ... Wabash R. Co. v. Railroad Commission, 176 Ind. 428, ... 95 N.E. 673; ... ...
-
City of Baltimore v. Sitnick (State Report Title: Mayor and City Council of Baltimore v. Sitnick)
...422 P.2d 455 (Okl.1967); Staley v. City of Winston-Salem, 258 N.C. 244, 128 S.E.2d 604 (1962); West Chicago Street R. R. Co. v. Ill., 201 U.S. 506, 521, 26 S.Ct. 518, 50 L.Ed. 845 (1906). ...