West v. Com., 2161-92-4
| Decision Date | 07 June 1994 |
| Docket Number | No. 2161-92-4,2161-92-4 |
| Citation | 445 S.E.2d 159,18 Va.App. 456 |
| Parties | Mark Hamilton WEST, v. COMMONWEALTH of Virginia. Record |
| Court | Virginia Court of Appeals |
Harvey S. Williams (Susan A. Sinrod, on briefs), for appellant.
Donald R. Curry, Sr. Asst. Atty. Gen. (Stephen D. Rosenthal, Atty. Gen.; Virginia B. Theisen, Asst. Atty. Gen. on brief), for appellee.
Present: MOON, C.J., and WILLIS and FITZPATRICK, JJ.
This is an appeal from an interlocutory order in a criminal case. Defendant Mark H. West challenges a circuit court's refusal to dismiss on double jeopardy grounds his possession of marijuana with intent to distribute indictment. He maintains that on March 10, 1992, he was charged with both possession with intent to distribute more than one-half ounce but less than five pounds of marijuana and simple possession of marijuana and that he later pled guilty to simple possession in the general district court. Because this Court has no jurisdiction to decide a defendant's interlocutory appeal in a criminal case, we transfer the appeal.
The appellate jurisdiction of the Court of Appeals is limited to the subject matter set forth in Code §§ 17-116.05 and 17-116.05:1. Our jurisdiction to decide appeals from interlocutory orders is provided by Code § 17-116.05(4), which further limits that jurisdiction to cases involving administrative agency appeals, workers' compensation appeals, and domestic relations appeals from an interlocutory decree or order in cases "(i) granting, dissolving, or denying an injunction or (ii) adjudicating the principles of a cause." Id. This appeal involves no such order or decree.
West argues that, regardless of this Court's lack of statutory appellate jurisdiction to decide his appeal of the denial of a motion to dismiss on double jeopardy grounds, constitutional due process and equal protection principles require that appellate process be open to him. Otherwise, West argues, he is subjected to a second "trial" and loses the very right the Fifth Amendment protects. See Abney v. United States, 431 U.S. 651, 660, 97 S.Ct. 2034, 2040, 52 L.Ed.2d 651 (1977); United States v. Blackwell, 900 F.2d 742 (4th Cir.1990).
Article VI, § 1, of the Virginia Constitution is the source of original and appellate jurisdiction for Virginia courts. "The Constitution provides that 'the Supreme Court shall, by virtue of this Constitution, have appellate jurisdiction ... in cases involving the life or liberty of any person.' "...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Wright v. Com.
...review whether the nolle prosequi was properly granted in this case. We are a court of limited jurisdiction. West v. Commonwealth, 18 Va.App. 456, 457, 445 S.E.2d 159, 159 (1994), appeal dismissed, 249 Va. 241, 455 S.E.2d 1 (1995). Pursuant to Code § 17.1-406(A), we may hear appeals arising......
-
Bullis v. Bullis
...Appellee does not contest jurisdiction. We are required, however, to ascertain our jurisdiction before proceeding. West v. Commonwealth, 18 Va.App. 456, 445 S.E.2d 159 (1994), appeal dismissed, 249 Va. 241, 455 S.E.2d 1 (1995); In re O'Neil, 18 Va.App. 674, 446 S.E.2d 475 (1994). In Virgini......
-
West v. Com., 940956
...Section 1 of the Constitution of Virginia, this Court has "general appellate jurisdiction" in criminal cases. West v. Commonwealth, 18 Va.App. 456, 458, 445 S.E.2d 159, 160 (1994). We consistently have held that criminal appeals to this Court lie only to final judgments. See, e.g., Sturgill......
-
Va. Dep't of Corr. v. Hodges
...Canova Elec. Contracting, Inc. v. LMI Ins. Co., 22 Va. App. 595, 599, 471 S.E.2d 827, 830 (1996) (quoting West v. Commonwealth, 18 Va. App. 456, 457, 445 S.E.2d 159, 159 (1994), appeal dismissed, 249 Va. 241, 455 S.E.2d 1 (1995)). "Unless a statute confers jurisdiction in this Court, we are......