West v. Parker

Decision Date27 November 2017
Docket NumberNo. 17–6024.,17–6024.
CitationWest v. Parker, 138 S.Ct. 476(Mem), 199 L.Ed.2d 364(Mem) (2017)
Parties Stephen Michael WEST, et al., petitioners, v. Tony PARKER, Commissioner, Tennessee Department of Corrections, et al.
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Tennessee, Middle Division denied.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
10 cases
  • Abdur'Rahman v. Parker
    • United States
    • Tennessee Supreme Court
    • October 8, 2018
    ...which is a barbiturate. See West v. Schofield , 519 S.W.3d 550, 552 (Tenn. 2017), cert. denied sub nom. West v. Parker , ––– U.S. ––––, 138 S.Ct. 476, 199 L.Ed.2d 364 (2017), and cert. denied sub nom. Abdur'Rahman v. Parker , ––– U.S. ––––, 138 S.Ct. 647, 199 L.Ed.2d 545 (2018), reh'g denie......
  • Middlebrooks v. Parker
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit
    • January 13, 2022
    ... ... Instead, he proposes that the State use either nitrogen hypoxia or pentobarbital. 2 The irony? In an earlier case, Middlebrooks argued that pentobarbital posed "a substantial risk of a lingering death." See West v. Schofield , 519 S.W.3d 550, 552 (Tenn. 2017). Now he claims pentobarbital "will greatly reduce the substantial risk of severe pain." R. 13, Pg. ID 18788. One might wonder if this litigation is about pain at all or simply delay. After decades of litigation, the answer seems self-evident. II ... ...
  • State v. Irick
    • United States
    • Tennessee Supreme Court
    • August 6, 2018
    ...single-drug lethal injection protocol. West v. Schofield , 519 S.W.3d 550 (Tenn. 2017), cert. denied sub nom. West v. Parker , ––– U.S. ––––, 138 S.Ct. 476, 199 L.Ed.2d 364 (2017) and Abdur'Rahman v. Parker , ––– U.S. ––––, 138 S.Ct. 647, 199 L.Ed.2d 545 (2018).On January 8, 2018, TDOC adop......
  • Sutton v. Parker
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Middle District of Tennessee
    • September 5, 2019
    ...by a lethal dose of the barbiturate pentobarbital. West v. Schofield, 519 S.W.3d 550, 552 (Tenn. 2017), cert. denied sub nom. West v. Parker, 138 S. Ct. 476 (2017), and cert. denied sub nom. Abdur'Rahman v. Parker, 138 S. Ct. 647 (2018), reh'g denied, 138 S. Ct. 1183 (2018). A group of deat......
  • Get Started for Free