Western Cas. & Sur. Co. v. Adkins, 80-CA-1969-MR

Decision Date24 July 1981
Docket NumberNo. 80-CA-1969-MR,80-CA-1969-MR
Citation619 S.W.2d 502
PartiesWESTERN CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY, Appellant, v. Carolyn June ADKINS, Appellee.
CourtKentucky Court of Appeals

James B. Todd, Pikeville, for appellant.

Dan Jack Combs, Pikeville, for appellee.

Before HOGGE, VANCE and WINTERSHEIMER, JJ.

VANCE, Judge.

The question is whether an employer who has voluntarily paid an injured employee benefits for total injury during the pendency of a proceeding before the Worker's Compensation Board can take credit on a final award for permanent partial disability for the total amount voluntarily paid or credit only for the amount of the permanent partial award multiplied by the number of weeks the voluntary payment was made.

The appellee was injured on August 3, 1978. For the period from August 3, 1978, to February 6, 1979, the appellant voluntarily paid appellee benefits for temporary total disability. These payments were $112.00 per week for 26.71 weeks and amounted to a total payment of $2,991.52. Voluntary payments were discontinued on February 6, 1979.

In February of 1980, the Board issued an order holding that appellee is 100% disabled; that 50% of the disability is due to a pre-existing disability; that 25% of the disability is due to the compensable injury and 25% due to arousal of a dormant nondisabling condition. As a result 25% of the disability was apportioned to the Special Fund, 25% to the employer and 50% was noncompensable. The employer was directed to pay to appellee the sum of $28.00 per week from August 3, 1978, the date of the injury, for so long as she is disabled and the employer was permitted to take credit for any payments of compensation heretofore paid.

The employer computed the amount due under the award and deducted $2,991.52, the amount voluntarily paid, and tendered a check therefor to appellee. Appellee contended that the employer was not entitled to deduct the full dollar amount of the voluntary payments, but only the number of weeks payments were made (26.71) multiplied by the amount of the employer's weekly liability ($28.00). In effect, the appellee contends that although the employer paid her voluntarily the sum of $2,991.52 for a period of 26.71 weeks, the employer is only permitted to take credit for $747.88 against the award.

The trial court permitted the appellant to take credit only for 23 weeks of the award, but not for the total amount paid.

Appellee relies upon the cases of Department of Finance v. Wright, Ky., 425 S.W.2d 740 (1968), and Cottrell v. Alton Box Board Company, Ky., 510 S.W.2d 19 (1974). Neither of those cases is...

To continue reading

Request your trial
13 cases
  • Carter v. Mountain Bell
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of New Mexico
    • 7 Octubre 1986
    ...prejudgment payment contribution. 101 N.M. at 777, 689 P.2d at 293 (citation omitted) (quoting in part Casualty & Surety Co. v. Adkins, 619 S.W.2d 502, 503-04 (Ky.App.1981)). Cases allowing credit based on private plans contain the same rationale. See, e.g., Cowan v. Southwestern Bell Telep......
  • Evans v. AT & T Technologies, Inc.
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • 17 Julio 1992
    ...See, e.g., Triangle Insulation & Sheet Metal Co. v. Stratemeyer, 782 S.W.2d 628, 630 (Ky.1990); Western Casualty and Surety Co. v. Adkins, 619 S.W.2d 502, 504 (Ky.Ct.App.1981); Western Electric, Inc. v. Ferguson, 371 So.2d 864, 868 (Miss.1979); Cowan v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co., 529 ......
  • Paternoster v. La Cuesta Cabinets, Inc.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of New Mexico
    • 25 Septiembre 1984
    ...due under the award. Perhaps the clearest rationale for the application of credit is found in Western Casualty & Surety Co. v. Adkins, 619 S.W.2d 502, 503-04 (Ky.App.1981), where the Kentucky Court of Appeals In our view, the voluntary payment of compensation benefits during the pendency of......
  • Tiensvold v. Universal Transport, Inc.
    • United States
    • South Dakota Supreme Court
    • 20 Septiembre 1990
    ...any event so as not to penalize the employer. Id. at 758. (Emphasis added). We also adopt the reasoning in Western Casualty and Surety Company v. Adkins, 619 S.W.2d 502 (Ky.App.1981) wherein it was Any statutory interpretation which would penalize an employer who voluntarily makes weekly pa......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT