Western Indem. Co., Inc. v. Alley, 15171
| Decision Date | 19 November 1987 |
| Docket Number | No. 15171,15171 |
| Citation | Western Indem. Co., Inc. v. Alley, 740 S.W.2d 372 (Mo. App. 1987) |
| Parties | WESTERN INDEMNITY COMPANY, INC., Respondent, v. Gary Lynn ALLEY and Lana Kay Alley, Appellants. |
| Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
Donald Rhodes, Bloomfield, for appellants.
Albert C. Lowes, Kathleen A. Wolz, Lowes & Drusch, Cape Girardeau, for respondent.
Gary Alley was the victim of an armed robbery, kidnapping, and shooting in which Kenneth Samuel Conway was a participant. This is a declaratory judgment action by Western Indemnity Company (Western) seeking a determination of whether a homeowner's liability insurance policy issued by Western to Conway's parents provided coverage for damages to Alley and his wife as a result of Conway's criminal conduct. Following a trial to the court, judgment was entered for Western denying coverage. The Alleys appeal claiming that under the evidence in this case, the court should have found that Conway's conduct was negligent rather than intentional and that Conway was an insured under his parent's homeowner's policy. We affirm.
In a court tried case, the decree or judgment of the trial court will be sustained unless there is no substantial evidence to support it, it is against the weight of the evidence, it erroneously declares the law, or it erroneously applies the law. Wojtkowski v. Shelter Insurance Companies, 702 S.W.2d 74, 76 (Mo. banc 1985). The facts in this case unquestionably demonstrate the existence of substantial evidence supporting the trial court's judgment.
On April 23, 1983, Gary Lynn Alley was working alone at a combination service station and convenience store located near I-55 in New Madrid County. At about 2:15 a.m., Billy Ray Kimball and Conway, driving an El Camino pickup, parked some distance from the entry to the convenience store near some fuel storage tanks. Kimball entered the store and after some preliminary conversation, pointed a semiautomatic pistol at Alley and instructed him to fill a paper sack with money. Alley did so. At some point during the robbery, Kimball realized that Alley knew him by name and could identify him.
Kimball ordered Alley outside into the El Camino. Alley, Conway, and Kimball left the store. After driving 15 to 20 minutes, Conway turned off onto a dirt field road and proceeded for approximately one-half mile before parking the vehicle. Conway and Kimball were apparently still concerned about being identified by Alley, because it was at that point that Conway reached over and grabbed Alley's eyeglasses. He crushed them and threw them outside the vehicle.
Kimball then exited the El Camino and ordered Alley to get out, empty his pockets, and turn over his watch, which Alley did. Kimball then ordered Alley to step away from the vehicle and stand still. At that time, Conway told Alley to run. After taking two or three steps, again on orders from Kimball, Alley stopped and turned facing Kimball. Alley began to plead for his life, telling Kimball he did not want to die. Kimball said he was going to get back in the truck and think about it. Approximately two minutes later, Kimball got out of the truck again. Alley again begged Kimball to spare his life, to which Kimball replied, Kimball then raised the pistol and fired it. The bullet struck Alley in the neck, knocking him to the ground. Kimball then got back in the El Camino, and Conway drove off. At no time did Conway attempt to help Alley or persuade Kimball not to shoot Alley. Alley managed to walk to a...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
American Family Mut. Ins. Co. v. Pacchetti, No. 73041
...policy denying coverage for "expected or intended" injuries encompasses the insured's intentional acts. Western Indemnity Co. v. Alley, 740 S.W.2d 372, 374 (Mo.App.1987); Travelers Ins. Co. v. Cole, 631 S.W.2d 661, 664 When determining whether injuries are intentional for purposes of insura......
-
Mid-Century Ins. Co. v. L.D.G.
...case. Missouri's case law, including Pacchetti, has never so restricted the character or degree of injury. See Western Indemnity Co. v. Alley, 740 S.W.2d 372 (Mo.App.1987) and Shelter Mutual Ins. Co. v. Parrish, 659 S.W.2d 315 (Mo.App.1983), both of which refer to the terminology "bodily in......
-
Ohio Cas. Ins. Co. v. Henderson
...113, 450 N.W.2d at 456. See also Continental W. Ins. Co. v. Toal, 309 Minn. 169, 244 N.W.2d 121, 125-26 (1976); Western Indem. Co., Inc. v. Alley, 740 S.W.2d 372 (Mo.App.1987). It seems to me that reasoning and result are consistent with the notion, recognized in Arizona, that "[p]ublic pol......
-
Steelman v. Holford
...Co. v. Cole, 631 S.W.2d 661 (Mo.App.1982); Shelter Mut. Ins. Co. v. Parrish, 659 S.W.2d 315 (Mo.App.1983), and Western Indem. Co., Inc. v. Alley, 740 S.W.2d 372 (Mo.App.1987). While we have no quarrel with any of the rules of law expressed in these cases, all are distinguishable on the fact......
-
Section 4.61 Expected or Intended Injury
...the intent to harm will be inferred if the natural and probable consequences of the insured’s act produced harm. W. Indem. Co. v. Alley, 740 S.W.2d 372 (Mo. App. S.D. 1987); see also Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v. Bollig, 878 S.W.2d 837, 839 (Mo. App. S.D. 1994). It is sufficient that the consequ......