Western Union Tel. Co. v. INTERNATIONAL B. OF E. WORKERS
Decision Date | 16 July 1924 |
Docket Number | No. 4047.,4047. |
Citation | 2 F.2d 993 |
Parties | WESTERN UNION TELEGRAPH CO. v. INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, LOCAL UNION NO. 134, et al. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Northern District of Illinois |
West & Eckhart, of Chicago, Ill. (Wm. Rothmann and Wm. L. Bourland, both of Chicago, Ill., and Francis R. Stark, of New York City, of counsel), for complainant.
Hope Thompson and Timothy J. Fell, both of Chicago, Ill., for defendants.
The facts stated in the bill and supporting affidavits, in my opinion, show an interference with interstate commerce. They meet the test laid down by Chief Justice Taft speaking for the Supreme Court in United Mine Workers of America et al. v. Coronado Coal Co. et al., 259 U. S. 344, 408, 42 S. Ct. 570, 582 (66 L. Ed. 975, 27 A. L. R. 762). He said:
The plaintiff here is a public utility. A large part of its business is the transmission of messages. It is required to serve the public without discrimination. If the plaintiff is to perform its public duty, the instrumentalities for the transmission of the messages must be installed and maintained. If the purpose of the combination here shown to exist is carried out, the commerce itself is destroyed. The intent to restrain interstate commerce therefore appears as an obvious consequence of the acts of the defendants.
But, if it were held that the intent to obstruct interstate commerce is not established, a case for equitable relief against an unlawful boycott is made out, in my opinion, in view of the diversity of citizenship of the parties. Carlson v. Carpenter Contractors' Association, 305 Ill. 331, 338, 137 N. E. 222, 27 A. L. R. 625; Wilson v. Hey, 232 Ill. 49, 83 N. E. 928, 16 L. R. A. (N. S.) 85, 122 Am. St. Rep. 119, 13 Ann. Cas. 82; Franklin Union v. People, 220 Ill. 355, 376, 377, 77 N. E. 176, 4 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1001, 110 Am. St. Rep. 248; Chicago, Wilmington & Vermillion Coal Co. v. People, 214 Ill. 421, 73 N. E. 770.
The right of plaintiff to relief being sustained, we come to consider the scope of the injunction to be granted. In this connection it is to be considered that acts lawful in themselves may be a step in the execution of the plan of an unlawful or criminal conspiracy. In Aikens v. Wisconsin, 195 U. S. 194, 206, 25 S. Ct. 3, 6 (49 L. Ed. 154), it was said:
In Hitchman Coal & Coke Co. v. Mitchell, 245 U. S. 229, 253, 38 S. Ct. 65, 73 (62 L. Ed. 260, L. R. A. 1918C, 497, Ann. Cas. 1918B, 461), it was said:
"The cardinal error of defendants' position lies in the assumption that the right is so absolute that it may be exercised under any circumstances and without any qualification; whereas in truth, like other rights that exist in civilized society, it must always be exercised with reasonable regard for the conflicting rights of others."
And in Grenada Lumber Co. v. Mississippi, 217 U. S. 433, 440, 30 S. Ct. 535, 538 (54 L. Ed. 826), the Supreme Court said:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
County Sanitation Dist. No. 2 v. Los Angeles County Employees' Assn.
...protects only the right of employees to withhold personal services as individuals. (See, e.g., Western Union Tel. Co. v. International B. of E. Workers (N.D.Ill.1924) 2 F.2d 993, 994-995, affd. (7th Cir.1925) 6 F.2d 444.) However, as explained above, this line of argument cannot justify the......
-
Western Union Tel. Co. v. INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD, ETC., 8043.
...there was shown an intent to restrain interstate commerce, but also because there was shown diverse citizenship and an unlawful boycott. 2 F.2d 993; 7 Cir., 6 F.2d 444, 46 A.L.R. 1538. There were no findings of violence, and this court, in affirming the decree of July 19, 1924, stated it ig......
-
Int'l Union, U. A. W. A. A. F. of L., Local 232 v. Wis. Employment Relations Bd.
...the United States. The constitutional point of involuntary servitude here argued was in issue in Western Union Tel. Co. v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, D.C., 2 F.2d 993. It is said in the opinion in that case, 2 F.2d at page 994: ‘As to clause 1 of the prayer for a tempo......