Western Union Tel Co v. Pendleton

Citation30 L.Ed. 1187,7 S.Ct. 1126,122 U.S. 347
PartiesWESTERN UNION TEL. CO. v. PENDLETON
Decision Date27 May 1887
CourtUnited States Supreme Court

The statute of Indiana declares that 'every electric telegraph company, with a line of wires wholly or partly in this state, and engaged in telegraphing for the public, shall, during the usual office hours, receive dispatches, whether from other telegraphing lines or from individuals; and on payment or tender of the usual charge, according to the regulations of such company, shall transmit the same with impartiality and good faith, and in the order of time in which they are received, under penalty, in case of failure to transmit, or if postponed out of such order, of one hundred dollars, to be recovered by the person whose dispatch is neglected or postponed: provided, however, that arrangements may be made with the publishers of newspapers for the transmission of intelligence of general and public interest out of its order, and that communications for and from officers of justice shall take precedence of all others,' (section 4176, Rev. St. Ind. 1881;) and that 'such companies shall deliver all dispatches, by messenger, to the persons to whom the same are addressed, or to their agents, on the payment of any charges due for the same: provided, such persons or agents reside within one mile of the telegraphic station, or within the city or town in which such station is,' (section 4178, Id.)

The present action is brought by William Pendleton, the plaintiff below, to recover of the Western Union Telegraph Company the penalty of $100 prescribed by the above statute, for failing to deliver at Ottumwa, in Iowa, a message received by it in Indiana for transmission to that place. The complaint, as finally amended, alleges that the defendant below, the Western Union Telegraph Company, is a corporation organized and subsisting under the laws of Indiana, with a line of wires from Shelbyville, in that state, to Ottumwa, in Iowa; that on the fourteenth of April, 1883, at 35 minutes past 5 o'clock in the afternoon, at which time the company was engaged in telegraphing for the public, the plaintiff delivered to its agent, at its office in Shelbyville, the following telegram for transmission to its office in Ottumwa, viz.:

'APRIL 14, 1883.

'To Rosa Pendleton, care James Harker, near City grave-Yard, Ottumwa, Iowa: Have you shipped things? If not, don't ship. Answer quick.

'WM. PENDLETON.'

——That, upon its delivery, the plaintiff paid the agent 60 cents, being the amount of the charge required for its transmission from Shelbyville to Ottumwa; that, without any fault or interference on his part, the company, after transmitting the message to Ottumwa, where it was received at half past 7 in the afternoon of that day, failed to deliver it either to Rosa Pendleton or to James Harker, whereby the plaintiff sustained damage and the defendant became liable for $100, under the statute of Indiana, for which sum plaintiff demands judgment.

To this complaint the company answered, admitting the receipt of the telegram as alleged, and setting up that it transmitted the message with impartiality and goodf aith, in the order of time in which it was received, and without delay, to its office in Ottumwa, Iowa, where it was received, as alleged, at half past 7 of that day; that James Harker, to whose care the message was directed, lived more than one mile from the telegraph station at Ottumwa, that, in accordance with the usual custom of the office, the message was, without delay, placed in the post-office of that town, with proper stamp thereon, and duly addressed; and that the telegram was received by the person to whom it was addressed on the following morning, April 15, 1883, at about 9 o'clock. The answer further set forth that the duties and liabilities of telegraph companies in Iowa, and the transmission and delivery of the telegrams within the state, are regulated by a special statute of that state, which is as follows, viz.: 'Any person employed in transmitting messages by telegraph must do so without unreasonable delay, and any one who willfully fails thus to transmit them, or who intentionally transmits a message erroneously, or makes known the contents of any message sent or received to any person except him to whom it is addressed, or to his agent or attorney, is guilty of a misdemeanor. The proprietor of a telegraph is liable for all mistakes in transmitting messages made by any person in his employment, and for all damages resulting from a failure to perform any other duties required by law.' That by that statute the defendant was not required to deliver telegrams by messenger to the persons to whom they were addressed. That in the city of Ottumwa it had established a certain district within which it delivered telegrams by messenger, and that, on the receipt of the telegram in question at Ottumwa, it was ascertained that Harker, to whose care it was addressed, did not reside within the delivery district, but outside of it, and more than one mile from the defendant's office; and that, in accordance with the custom and usage of the office, and in order to facilitate the delivery of the message, a copy of the telegram was promptly placed in the post-office at Ottumwa, with proper address, and delivered as stated above.

To this answer the plaintiff demurred; the circuit court of the state sustained the demurrer; and, the defendant electing to stand upon its answer, judgment was rendered for the plaintiff for $100, which, on appeal to the supreme court of the state, was affirmed, and the company brings the case here for review.

J. E. McDonald, John M. Butler, and Augustus L. Mason, for plaintiff in error.

[Argument of Counsel from pages 350-356 intentionally omitted] No appearance for defendant in error.

Mr. Justice FIELD, after stating the case as above, delivered the opinion of the court as follows:

The contention of the Western Union Telegraph Company is that the law of Indiana is in conflict with the clause of the constitution vesting in congress the power to regulate commerce among the states.

In Telegraph Co. v. Texas, 105 U. S. 460, it was decided by this court that intercourse by the telegraph between the states is...

To continue reading

Request your trial
147 cases
  • Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Lee
    • United States
    • Kentucky Court of Appeals
    • February 23, 1917
    ... ... another constitute a portion of commerce itself ... Pensacola Telegraph Co. v. Western Union Tel. Co., ... 96 U.S. 1, 24 L.Ed. 708; Western Union Tel. Co. v ... Texas, 105 U.S. 460, 26 L.Ed. 1067; Western Union ... Tel. Co. v. Pendleton, 122 U.S. 347, 7 S.Ct. 1126, 30 ... L.Ed. 1187; Western Union ... [192 S.W. 72] ... Tel. Co. v. James, 162 U.S. 654, 16 S.Ct. 934, 40 ... L.Ed. 1105; Western Union Tel. Co. v. Commercial Milling ... Co., 218 U.S. 406, 31 S.Ct. 59, 54 L.Ed. 1088, 36 L.R.A ... (N. S.) 220, 21 Ann.Cas ... ...
  • State v. Salt Lake Tribune Pub. Co.
    • United States
    • Utah Supreme Court
    • September 17, 1926
    ... ... Post ... Printing & Publishing Company v. Brewster, 246 F. 321; ... Western U. Telegraph Company v. Pendleton, 122 U.S ... 347; 7 S.Ct. 1126; 30 L.Ed. 1187; International ... Schollenberger v. Pennsylvania , 171 U.S. 1, 18 S.Ct ... 757, 43 L.Ed. 49; Western Union Tel. Co. v ... Pendleton , 122 U.S. 347, 7 S.Ct. 1126, 30 L.Ed. 1187; ... International T. Co ... ...
  • Shepard v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Minnesota
    • April 8, 1911
    ... ... Co. v. Wharton, 207 U.S. 328, 28 Sup.Ct. 121, 52 L.Ed ... 230; Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Kansas, 216 U.S ... 1, 24, 27, 37, 30 Sup.Ct. 190, 54 L.Ed. 355; Ludwig ... ( Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Pendleton, 122 U.S ... 347, 7 Sup.Ct. 1126, 30 L.Ed. 1187); prohibiting a higher ... rate for a short ... ...
  • Atlantic Pacific Telegraph Company v. City of Philadelphia
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • June 1, 1903
    ...122 U. S. 326, 336, 346, 30 L. ed. 1200, 1201, 1205, 1 Inters. Com. Rep. 308, 7 Sup. Ct. Rep. 1118; Western U. Teleg. Co. v. Pendleton, 122 U. S. 347, 357, 30 L. ed. 1187, 1189, 1 Inters. Com. Rep. 306, 7 Sup. Ct. Rep. 1126; Bowman v. Chicago & N. W. R. Co. 125 U. S. 465, 497, 31 L. ed. 700......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • The Dormant Commerce Clause: the Origin Story and the "considerable Uncertainties"- 1824 to 1945
    • United States
    • University of Nebraska - Lincoln Nebraska Law Review No. 52, 2022
    • Invalid date
    ...violated the Dormant Commerce Clause. W. Union Tel. Co. v. Texas, 105 U.S. 460 (1881). In Western Union Telephone Co. v. Pendleton, 122 U.S. 347 (1887), the Court struck down an Indiana penalty of $100 for the failure to timely deliver a telegraph to a neighboring state. The Court held that......
  • Extraterritoriality and the Dormant Commerce Clause: A Doctrinal Post-Mortem
    • United States
    • Louisiana Law Review No. 73-4, July 2013
    • July 1, 2013
    ...Doctrine , 50 WM. & MARY L. REV. 417, 437–40 (2008) (discussing the direct–indirect test). 16. 234 U.S. 542 (1914). 17. Id. at 547. 18. 122 U.S. 347 (1887). 19. Id. at 358. 2013] EXTRATERRITORIALITY AND THE DCCD 983 power of a state to so impose its authority beyond its own limits.” 20 In t......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT