Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Hill, 6858.
| Decision Date | 08 November 1933 |
| Docket Number | No. 6858.,6858. |
| Citation | 67 F.2d 487 |
| Parties | WESTERN UNION TELEGRAPH CO. v. HILL. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit |
Gerry Cabaniss, of Birmingham, Ala., and Geo. P. Cooper, of Huntsville, Ala., for appellant.
M. U. Griffin and Earle R. Ford, both of Huntsville, Ala., for appellee.
Before BRYAN, FOSTER, and HUTCHESON, Circuit Judges.
Louise B. Hill sued and recovered judgment against the Western Union Telegraph Company for damages for an assault alleged to have been committed upon her by the manager of that company's office at Huntsville, Ala. The defendant appeals, and assigns as error the refusal of the trial court to direct a verdict in its favor.
Plaintiff's husband had in his store, where she worked, an electric clock maintained by defendant. Plaintiff testified that the clock was not keeping correct time; that she went to the company's office half a block away from her husband's store to request Sapp, the manager of the office, to have the clock fixed; that, when she entered, Sapp, who appeared to her to be somewhat intoxicated, was standing behind the counter, and, when she asked him about fixing the clock, he said: She later said, on direct examination, that Sapp's language was: "Come behind the counter and let me love and pet you." She further testified that his hands came within an inch or two of her and would have touched her except for the fact that she jumped back out of the way.
Mere words, however provoking or insulting, do not constitute an assault. 5 C. J. 617. It may be assumed that there was a technical assault which would have been completed if the plaintiff had not jumped back out of the manager's reach. But in our opinion the defendant is not liable, and for the reason that its manager in committing the assault was not acting within the scope of his employment. If an assault be committed by a servant while he is in pursuit of his master's business, although in a wrong or even forbidden way, the master is nevertheless liable. But, if the assault does not spring from, and has no connection with, the servant's duties, the master is not liable. Hardeman v. Williams, 150 Ala. 415, 43 So. 726, 10 L. R. A. (N. S.) 653; Evers v. Krouse, 70 N. J. Law, 653, 58 A. 181, 66 L. R. A. 592; 3 Cooley on Torts (4th Ed.) §§ 391, 396; 18 R. C. L. 795 et seq. The District Judge fully recognized...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
City of Green Cove Springs v. Donaldson
...of Miami v. Simpson, supra; Columbia By the Sea, Inc., v. Petty, 2d D. C.A.Fla.1963, 157 So.2d 190. 5 See also Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Hill, 5th Cir. 1933, 67 F.2d 487; Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Hill, 1953, 25 Ala.App. 540, 150 So. 709, cert. den., 227 Ala. 469, 150 So. 711, Gre......
-
John v. Lococo
... ... v. Carl J. Adams, supra; Western Union Tel. Co. v. Hill ... (C.C.A.) 67 F.2d 487; Hardeman ... ...
-
Claris v. Oregon Short Line Railroad Co.
... ... 123, 67 L.Ed. 299, 301; Western Union Tel. Co. v ... Hill, 67 F.2d 487; 39 Corpus Juris, ... ...
-
James v. Governor's House, Inc.
...227 Ala. 469, 150 So. 711. Also see Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Lantrip, 26 Ala.App. 79, 153 So. 296; Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Hill, 5 Cir., 67 F.2d 487. We have said that it is a mistake to suppose that expressions in judicial opinions, properly there used, can be made to ser......