Westmoreland v. Butler County
| Docket Number | 21-5168 |
| Decision Date | 24 March 2022 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
70 cases
-
Trozzi v. Lake Cnty.
...Cir. Feb. 10, 2022) (examining what the prison official knew about a detainee's treatment plan); cf. Westmoreland v. Butler County, 29 F.4th 721, 729, No. 21-5168, (6th Cir. Mar. 24, 2022) (holding that for failure-to-protect claims a "defendant officer must act intentionally in a manner th......
-
Grady-Wilkins v. Unknown Newton
...did not, however, address whether an objective standard applies in other Fourteenth Amendment pretrial detainment contexts. Westmoreland, 29 F.4th at 726-27. The Westmoreland court concluded that the Kingsley objective standard applies to “failure-to-protect” claims against individual offic......
-
Vontz v. Winger
...the claims of a pretrial detainee. Protections for pretrial detainees are provided by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Id. at 727. A plaintiff must demonstrate substantial risk of serious harm” whether the claim arises under the Eighth Amendment or the Fourteenth Amendmen......
-
Tabor v. Worley
...‘deliberately' and ‘recklessly in the face of an unjustifiably high risk of harm that is either known or so obvious that it should be known.'” Id. (quoting Brawner, F.4th at 596). Here, the complaint alleges that Plaintiff was subjected to unconstitutional conditions of confinement when he ......
Get Started for Free