Westwood Pharmaceuticals v. Nat. Fuel Gas Dist.
Decision Date | 21 May 1990 |
Docket Number | No. Civ-88-1122C.,Civ-88-1122C. |
Citation | 737 F. Supp. 1272 |
Parties | WESTWOOD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., Plaintiff, v. NATIONAL FUEL GAS DISTRIBUTION CORPORATION, as Successor in Interest to Iroquois Gas Corporation, Defendant. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Western District of New York |
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED
Saperston & Day, P.C. (Daniel M. Darragh, of Counsel), Buffalo, N.Y., for plaintiff.
Phillips, Lytle, Hitchcock, Blaine & Huber (Robert E. Glanville, of Counsel), Buffalo, N.Y., for defendant.
Plaintiff Westwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ("Westwood"), claims that defendant National Fuel Gas Distribution Corporation ("National Fuel") is liable for Westwood's past and future response costs associated with the release of hazardous substances on a parcel of land in Buffalo, New York, purchased by Westwood from National Fuel's predecessor in interest, Iroquois Gas Corporation ("Iroquois"). Westwood has asserted four causes of action alleging that National Fuel is liable under either the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act ("CERCLA"), 42 U.S.C. § 9601, et seq., as amended by the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 ("SARA"), Pub.L. No. 99-499, 100 Stat. 1613 (1986), or the New York State common law of nuisance and unjust enrichment. National Fuel has moved for summary judgment dismissing Westwood's complaint and holding Westwood liable on National Fuel's counterclaims for its past response costs and for any future response costs it may incur. Westwood has moved for partial summary judgment under Section 107(a) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9607(a), for Westwood's past response costs; for declaratory judgment pursuant to CERCLA Sections 107(a) and 113(g)(2), 42 U.S.C. §§ 9607(a), 9613(g)(2), and the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201(a), on National Fuel's liability for any future response costs that Westwood may incur; and for summary judgment as to most of the affirmative defenses asserted by National Fuel.1
The site at issue encompasses approximately 8.8 acres bounded on the west by DeWitt Street, on the south by Bradley Street, on the east by Dart Street, and on the north by land owned by the Buffalo Structural Steel Corporation. The northwest corner of the site is bounded by Scajaquada Creek. It appears that the site has been put to industrial use since 1866. Before the land was purchased by People's Gas Company ("People's"), it was used for operations such as a sawmill, an iron-products manufacturing plant, a carriage and sleigh works, and a carriage-top manufacturing company. When People's bought the land in 1897, it constructed a gas-manufacturing plant. In 1925, Iroquois purchased the site for $375,000, gaining title by a referee's deed, and People's was subsequently dissolved in 1932.
Id., Exhibit L at ¶ 5. Westwood subsequently demolished the remaining structures at the site. According to Westwood, although it was told that "all buildings, tanks, pipelines and other improvements situate sic on the premises had been purged of natural gas and other chemicals" used in the business operations on the site, it was never told "of the existence of the partially demolished remains of buildings, process equipment, and waste residues left buried at the premises." Item 16 at 3.2
For its part, National Fuel claims that Iroquois was never told of Westwood's development plans prior to the sale, Item 14 at 6, although it seems unlikely that Iroquois was not aware that construction of some type would be undertaken at the site.
Westwood subsequently constructed a warehouse on the southern portion of the property. Soil borings associated with the construction were taken in 1973, and, according to National Fuel, those borings indicated "widespread petroleum-product contamination of the site." Item 14 at 8. Soil borings were also taken in 1984 and 1985 in connection with the construction of a warehouse on the northern portion of the site,3 and they revealed petroleum-related contaminants and other wastes. During excavation for the second warehouse, Westwood encountered subsurface pipeline and the remains of three separator pits and a filter bed. According to Westwood, the separator pits were filled with "demolition debris, and a mixture of water, tar, and waste oil"; the filter bed contained "oily contaminated water"; and the pipes contained "various process residues and waste materials." Item 16 at 3-4. In February, 1985, Westwood had a consultant dig a series of test pits on the location of the planned warehouse, and soil samplings from the pits apparently also displayed signs of petroleum-related contamination. See Item 14 at 10.
National Fuel alleges that Westwood continued with construction far too prematurely. It claims that "notwithstanding these repeated and detailed reports of widespread petroleum product contamination of the project area, Westwood did not initiate an investigation into the origin or scope of the contamination." Item 14 at 10. National Fuel also claims that Westwood likewise failed to confer with "its environmental consultants, its architects, its general construction contractor, or anyone else, to determine whether the conditions encountered required action to protect against a release of these substances into the environment." Id. at 10-11. National Fuel asserts that "on numerous occasions" in late 1985 and early 1986 it expressed concern to Westwood about the manner and pace of the construction activities, and that its concern over containing the migration of suspected wastes on or from the site led it to ask Westwood at least to modify those activities. National Fuel states that it reiterated these concerns by letter in February, 1986, see Item 13, Glanville Affidavit, Exhibit D at 41-42; Item 3 at ¶ 42, but that Westwood nonetheless proceeded with construction on an "expedited basis." Item 14 at 14.
In any event, it appears that the clay cap was removed from the site in October, 1985, during the early phases of construction of the second warehouse, and that Westwood subsequently continued with construction activities. The initial phase of construction apparently involved stripping topsoil to a depth of eighteen inches, and, according to National Fuel, it was during this process that the clay cap was removed. See Item 14 at 11. It appears that the separator pits were initially discovered by Westwood in approximately November, 1985.
Westwood states that, after submitting the materials it discovered at the site for chemical analysis, it contracted for the removal of the contaminated soil and the waste matter "in a manner which was consistent with the applicable waste management regulations of the New York Environmental Conservation Law." Item 16 at 4. Westwood also states that, subject to review and comment by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation ("DEC"), it initiated procedures designed to investigate the extent of soil and groundwater contamination at the site that included "the installation, sampling and analysis of groundwater monitoring wells, in a manner which is consistent with the provisions of the National Contingency Plan." Id. It is not clear, however, precisely when these actions were taken.
Westwood asserts that "the investigations conducted to date have established the existence of a release of hazardous substances at the Premises and have confirmed that the hazardous substances found at the site are constituents of the wastes and by-products from the gas manufacturing operations conducted there by Iroquois." Item 16 at 4-5. Westwood states that it has thus far incurred over $650,000 in costs associated with the investigation and cleanup of the site, and...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Chase Manhattan Bank, NA v. T & N PLC
...has been suffered different from the harm suffered by other members of the public. See id.; Westwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Nat'l Fuel Gas Distrib. Corp., 737 F.Supp. 1272, 1281-82 (W.D.N.Y.1990). Private nuisance, on the other hand, is a distinctly different cause of action. "In contrast......
-
Mangini v. Aerojet-General Corp.
...testing costs are sufficient to constitute "special injury" to plaintiffs under section 3493. (See Westwood Pharmaceuticals v. Nat. Fuel Gas Dist. (W.D.N.Y.1990) 737 F.Supp. 1272, 1281.) D. The complaint on its face does not show that defendant's acts were undertaken lawfully with the conse......
-
Interstate Power Co. v. Kansas City Power & Light Co.
...with regard to this state law claim. See Kirk v. Ridgway, 373 N.W.2d 491, 496 (Iowa 1985); Westwood Pharmaceuticals v. National Fuel Gas Distrib. Corp., 737 F.Supp. 1272, 1282-83 (W.D.N.Y.1990). Accordingly, judgment shall be ordered in favor of KCPL on this Count VII of IPC's Complaint ass......
-
Motor Ave. Co. v. Liberty Indus. Finishing Corp., CV 91-0968 (CBA).
...properties to maintain private nuisance claims against the former owners or lessees. See Westwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Nat'l Fuel Gas Dist., Corp., 737 F.Supp. 1272, 1282-84 (W.D.N.Y.1990) (concluded that New York courts would apply the doctrine of caveat emptor to preclude private nuis......
-
CHAPTER 8 WHAT EVERY LANDMAN SHOULD KNOW ABOUT ENVIRONMENTAL LAW AND WHY
...in part on other grounds, 2 F.3d 746 (7th Cir. 1993). [31] See Westwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. National Fuel Gas Distrib. Corp., 737 F. Supp. 1272 (W.D.N.Y. 1990), aff'd, 964 F.2d 85 (2d Cir. 1992). [32] The term "contractual relationship" excludes land contracts, deeds, and other instrum......
-
The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act: the correct paradigm of strict liability and the problem of individual causation.
...Lincoln Props., Ltd. v. Higgins, 823 F. Supp. 1528, 1536 (E.D. Cal. 1992); Westwood Pharm., Inc. v. Nat'l Fuel Gas Distrib. Corp., 737 F. Supp. 1272, 1285 (W.D.N.Y. 1990); Colorado v. Idarado Mining Co., 707 F. Supp. 1227, 1230 (D. Colo. 1989), amended, 735 F. Supp. 368 (D. Colo. 1990); rev......
-
CHAPTER 7 FEDERAL AND WESTERN STATES ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION OF COALBED GAS DEVELOPMENT
...the act of God defense). [101] 42 U.S.C. § 9607(b); see, e.g., Westwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. National Fuel Gas Distributing Corp., 737 F. Supp. 1272 (W.D.N.Y. 1990). [102] 42 U.S.C. § 9607(b). [103] Id. § 9601(14). [104] Note, however, that liability may attach pursuant to other federal......