Wettengel v. Gormley

Decision Date02 April 1894
Docket Number303
Citation28 A. 934,160 Pa. 559
PartiesWettengel v. Gormley, Appellant
CourtPennsylvania Supreme Court

Argued November 10, 1893

Appeal, No. 303, Oct. T., 1893, by defendant, James T Gormley, from judgment of C.P. No. 2, Allegheny Co., Jan. T 1893, No. 346, on case stated in favor of Annie B. Wettengel. Affirmed.

Case stated to determine ownership of royalties under oil lease.

The case stated was as follows:

"1. James Gormley, of Chartiers township, Allegheny county Pennsylvania, at and immediately before the time of his decease, was the owner in fee simple of that certain tract of land in North Fayette township, Allegheny county, Pennsylvania. [Here follows description.]

"2. On July 14, 1888, said James Gormley made a lease of said premises to J. A. Tomlinson, of Beaver county, Pennsylvania, for the purpose and with the exclusive right of drilling or operating for petroleum oil or gas thereon. And the rights of said J. A. Tomlinson, under said lease, by various assignments and transfers, have become vested in J. M. Guffy and others, doing business as the Oakdale Oil Co.

"3. Said James Gormley died on Oct. 1, 1890, having first made his last will and testament duly probated and registered in the register's office of Allegheny county, whereby he devised two hundred acres more or less of said six hundred acres to his son, James T. Gormley, in fee simple, and of the residue he devised two hundred acres more or less to his daughter, Annie B. Wettengel in fee, and the residue he devised to his daughter Mrs. Marie J. Lockhart in fee. [The will and lease were made part of the case stated.]

"4. The holders of said lease have drilled wells under and in pursuance of said lease, all of which are located within the boundaries of that portion of said six hundred acres which by the last will and testament aforesaid was devised to the said James T. Gormley, and all of which said wells are producing oil. In addition thereto one well was drilled on that portion of said land devised to Mrs. Lockhart, which latter well was a dry hole, producing nothing.

"5. Up to the date of this agreement said wells have produced in the aggregate 14,918 barrels of oil, and under the terms of the lease aforesaid one eighth thereof is payable as royalty, out of which royalty one third is payable to Mary Gormley, widow, as dower, and it was further provided in said lease that the lessee should pay the sum of one hundred dollars per month in advance, beginning with the date of said lease, so long as he kept said lease, until oil or gas should be found in paying quantities, after which payment was to be made by the royalty as aforesaid. The first oil under said lease was produced on the day of , 1891, being since the death of James Gormley, at which time the payment of one hundred dollars per month ceased. By the terms of said lease the right was given to the lessee to use sufficient water from the premises necessary to operations thereon, the right of way over and across said premises to place of operating, together with the right of laying pipes to convey oil and gas from the said farm.

"6. It is claimed by the plaintiff that she is entitled to a sum of money equal to the proportion which the area of the land devised to her as aforesaid bears to the whole amount of land included in the said oil lease, out of the oil produced as aforesaid, which for the purposes of this case is agreed to be in money value the sum of fifty-seven cents per barrel.

"7. On the other hand it is claimed by the defendant that the plaintiff is not entitled to any part whatever of the production of oil from the premises devised to him as aforesaid.

"If the court should be of the opinion that, under the law and the facts hereinbefore stated, the plaintiff is entitled to recover, then judgment is to be entered in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant for the aforesaid sum of two hundred and seven dollars; otherwise judgment to be entered in favor of the defendant."

The lease referred to in the case stated was as follows:

"Memorandum of agreement made and entered into this 14th day of July 1888, by and between James Gormley, of Chartiers township, Allegheny county, Pennsylvania, of the first part, and J. A. Tomlinson, of Beaver county, Pennsylvania, of the second part, Witnesseth: That the said party of the first part for the consideration, covenants, and agreements hereinafter mentioned, has granted, demised and let unto the party of the second part, his heirs and assigns, for the purpose and with the exclusive right of drilling and operating for petroleum oil or gas, with the right to sublet and subdivide:

"All that certain tract of land in North Fayette township Allegheny county, Pennsylvania, bounded and described as follows, to wit: By lands of Abraham Bell, Fife, Donaldson, Putnam, Morrow, Lutz, and others, containing six hundred acres more or less, being all the lands of said James Gormley in North Fayette township aforesaid, upon which said land said lessee agrees to drill not less than six wells. If oil or gas be found in paying quantities the second of said wells to be commenced within six months after completing the first, and one additional well to be commenced every six months until the six wells are drilled, provided gas or oil be found in paying quantities. The party of the second part, his heirs or assigns, to have and to hold the said premises for the said purpose only for and during the term of fifteen years from the date hereof. The said second party, in consideration of said grant and demise, agrees to give the party of the first part, the full equal one eighth part of all the petroleum oil obtained or produced on the premises herein leased, to deliver the same in tanks or pipe lines to the credit of the party of the first part. They further agree that if gas is obtained in sufficient quantities to utilize, the consideration in full to the party of the first part shall be five hundred dollars ($500) per annum for each and every gas well drilled on the premises herein described, if of sufficient pressure to guarantee the laying of pipe lines to convey it to market, payable in thirty days after the line is laid. The party of the first part grants the further privilege to the party of the second part of using sufficient water from the premises herein leased necessary to the operations thereon, the right of way over and across said premises to the place of operating, together with the right to lay pipes to convey all oil or gas from this farm, the right to remove any machinery or fixtures placed on the said premises by the said lessee, his heirs or assigns, provided that such removal shall not take place until all rents or royalties due under this lease have been fully paid. The said second party hereby agrees for himself, his heirs and assigns, to pay any damage done to growing crops by the laying of pipes by him, his heirs or assigns. It is also agreed between the parties hereto that should any well drilled by said party of the second part fail to produce gas or oil in paying quantities then and in that event said second party shall at his option be released from liability to drill additional wells, and in case he should so elect, he shall at once give said party of the first part notice of this fact, and thereupon all rights granted under this lease shall cease and determine so far as the same affects the land described except as to paying wells drilled and one hundred acres of land immediately adjacent and surrounding each of said wells. Three hundred feet each way surrounding the buildings on said premises are hereby reserved from being operated by said second party unless said first party decides to have it drilled. Operations to be conducted so as to interfere the least with farming privileges. Said lessee further agrees to pay the sum of one hundred dollars per month in advance, beginning with the date hereof, so long as he occupies said premises, until gas or oil is found in paying quantities, after which payment is to be made as above provided. All gates and fences opened by said lessee, his heirs or assigns are to be kept in good order, and so used as not to injure or damage the land or crops thereon. Any increase of taxes occasioned by this lease to be paid by the lessee. All springs in use by tenants are to be protected from injury occasioned by operating under this lease. It is...

To continue reading

Request your trial
49 cases
  • Howell v. Union Producing Company
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • 12 Marzo 1968
    ...supra note 1, at 54-55 and Myers, supra note 1, at 1. 5 The leading authority for the contrary position is Wettengel v. Gormley, 1874, 160 Pa. 559, 28 A. 934, 40 Am.St.Rep. 733, on second appeal, 1898, 184 Pa. 354, 39 A. 57. The extent of the conflict is seen in the twenty-five pages of tex......
  • Musgrave v. Musgrave
    • United States
    • West Virginia Supreme Court
    • 13 Abril 1920
    ... ... It is ... true the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania has taken the contrary ... view in the case of Wettengel v. Gormley, 160 Pa ... 559, 28 A. 934, 40 Am.St.Rep. 733, and 184 Pa. 354, 39 A. 57 ... We could not agree with the conclusion reached by that ... ...
  • Cent. Pipe Line Co. v. Hutson
    • United States
    • Illinois Supreme Court
    • 18 Noviembre 1948
    ...due to a fundamental difference of opinion regarding the innate character of potential oil or gas royalties. Wettengel v. Gormley, 1894, 160 Pa. 559, 28 A. 934,40 Am.St.Rep. 733, is the earliest reported case dealing with this issue. Gormley owned three farms and gave one oil-gas mining lea......
  • Briggs v. Sw. Energy Prod. Co.
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Supreme Court
    • 22 Enero 2020
    ...in part, on creating a low-pressure pathway from the mineral's subterranean location to the earth's surface. See Wettengel v. Gormley , 160 Pa. 559, 567, 28 A. 934, 935 (1894). Oil and gas have thus been described as having a "fugitive and wandering existence," Brown v. Vandergrift , 80 Pa.......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • CHAPTER 1 ADVANCED MINERAL CONVEYANCING AND TITLE ISSUES - PART 1
    • United States
    • FNREL - Special Institute Advanced Mineral Title Examination (FNREL)
    • Invalid date
    ...of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court that minerals could be produced equally from all subdivided parts of land. Wettengel v. Gormley, 28 A. 934 (Pa. 1894). [151] For an example of an unambiguous apportionment clause, see 28A West's Legal Forms, Specialized Forms, § 22:54 (4th ed., updated 2012......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT