WGOK, Inc. v. WMOZ, Inc., 1 Div. 71
Decision Date | 30 May 1963 |
Docket Number | 1 Div. 71 |
Citation | 275 Ala. 264,154 So.2d 22 |
Parties | WGOK, INC., et al. v. WMOZ, INC. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Vincent F. Kilborn and Kilborn, Darby & Kilborn, Mobile, for appellants.
Cecil B. King, Mobile, for appellee.
In the proceedings below the complainant filed its bill seeking to enjoin the respondents from doing certain acts to its detriment which the complainant alleges had been engaged in by the respondents to the injury of the appellee.
The cause came on for hearing in the court below on Friday, May 18, 1962. The record shows that about 3:15 P.M., on that date, and after examination of one witness presented by the appellant, the court, concluding that the case could not be completed that day, and that the hearing would require at least two days more, recessed the hearing to an indefinite time. The court thereupon issued a temporary injunction whereby the respondents were
From this order, the respondents below have attempted to perfect an appeal to this court.
An appeal does not lie from an order or decree granting a temporary injunction, unless the record shows that an order or decree was made or purported to be made after a hearing, as provided by Sec. 1054, Tit. 7, Code of Alabama 1940. Brooks v. Everett, 271 Ala. 380, 124 So.2d 100, and cases cited therein. As stated in the above opinion, the appellant's remedy in regard to the temporary injunction was by way of a motion to dissolve under the provisions of Sec. 1052, Tit. 7, Code of Alabama 1940, and if the ruling was adverse then appeal lies from such adverse ruling, Sec. 757, Tit. 7, Code of Alabama 1940.
A 'hearing' has recently been defined in Fiorella v. State, 40 Ala.App. 587, 121 So.2d 875, as follows:
'A 'hearing' ordinarily is defined, in matters not associated with full trials, as a proceeding in which the parties are afforded an opportunity to adduce proof and to argue (in person or by counsel) as to the inference flowing from the evidence.'
The record indicates that there were numerous witnesses who were to testify at the hearing below. The court's action in recessing...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Taggart v. Weinacker's, Inc.
...as provided by § 757, Title 7, Code 1940.' Brooks v. Everett, 271 Ala. 380, 384, 124 So.2d 100, 104. See also: WGOK, Inc. v. WMOZ, Inc., 275 Ala. 264, 265, 154 So.2d 22. Complainant says that assignment 1 presents nothing for review. We Complainant says further that because assignment 1 pre......
-
Ingram v. Erwin
...the injunction is '. . . the same as though the court had granted a temporary injunction without a hearing.' WGOK, Inc. v. WMOZ, Inc., 275 Ala. 264, 265, 154 So.2d 22, 24. As stated in the opinion last cited: '. . . the appellant's remedy in regard to the temporary injunction was by way of ......
-
Biddy v. Biddy
...of any statement made in the following cases.--D.B. Clayton & Associates v. McNaughton, 279 Ala. 159, 182 So.2d 890; WGOK, Inc., v. WMOZ, Inc., 275 Ala. 264, 154 So.2d 22; Fiorella v. State, 40 Ala.App. 587, 121 So.2d The record fails to disclose that there was a hearing of any kind on July......
-
D. B. Clayton and Associates v. McNaughton
...proceeding in which the parties are afforded an opportunity to adduce proof and to argue inferences from the evidence. WGOK, Inc. v. WMOZ, Inc., 275 Ala. 264, 154 So.2d 22; Fiorella v. State, 40 Ala.App. 587, 121 So.2d Thereafter, on 23 March 1965, McNaughton filed a demurrer to the complai......