Wheelahan v. Phila. Traction Co.

Decision Date13 July 1892
Docket Number403
Citation150 Pa. 187,24 A. 688
PartiesWheelahan v. Phila. Traction Co., Appellant
CourtPennsylvania Supreme Court

Argued January 8, 1892

Appeal, No. 403, Jan. T., 1891, by defendant, from judgment of C.P. No. 1, Phila. Co., March T., 1890, No. 180, on verdict for plaintiff in trespass for personal injuries caused by alleged negligence of defendant.

The facts as they appeared at the trial, before BREGY, J., are stated substantially in the opinion of the Supreme court. A witness for plaintiff testified that when plaintiff was fifteen or twenty feet from the track, the motor car was half a square away.

The court refused to give binding instructions for defendant. Verdict for plaintiff for $368.75, and judgment thereon whereupon defendant appealed.

Error assigned was refusal of binding instructions, quoting the point.

Judgment reversed.

Thomas Leaming, for appellant. -- The plaintiff was clearly guilty of contributory negligence in driving a heavy wagon at right angles to the path of a rapidly approaching cable car loaded with passengers without taking the trouble to lean forward so as to command a view of the street: Warner v. People Pass. R.R., 141 Pa. 615; Thomas v. Citizens Pass Ry., 132 Pa. 504; Buzby v. Trac. Co., 126 Pa. 559.

The argument of appellant that if the courts held failure to look for an approaching car when about to cross a cable track to be contributory negligence per se, without reference to the distance or speed of the approaching car, it would amount to a reductio ad absurdum if the train as a matter of fact happened to be two blocks off, is answered by the fact that under such circumstances, no accident would happen and there being no defendant or negligence there would be no contributory negligence. In other words, if a man crosses a cable track without looking when the train is approaching, he does a negligent act, but as no accident happens and he charges no one else with negligence he cannot himself be a contributor to a possible result which has never occurred. Whereas if when he crosses without looking, a car is approaching which strikes him and he subsequently endeavor to charge its owner with negligence, then his own negligence immediately becomes a contributory one to the result which did follow, to wit, the injury. In Beale v. P.R.R. Co., 73 Pa. 504, the same argument was submitted by plaintiff below, but the court answered that the fact of collision showed the necessity there was for care.

N DuBois Miller, with him Biddle & Ward, for appellee. -- When the plaintiff was within fifteen feet of the track, the car was half a square away and it was under these circumstances that the plaintiff drove on; when he had actually nearly crossed the track, the car, coming at full speed without slowing up and no bell being rung, ran into the wagon. Long before the car had reached the intersection, the wagon was on the track and even if plaintiff had seen the car half a square away, he would have been justified in continuing on his course, for he had the right to assume that the rules of the road would be observed by the car. The accident occurred at a street crossing, a point where ordinary care was required to be exercised by both: Schmidt v. McGill, 120 Pa. 405. On approaching a crossing, it is the duty of a driver or gripman of a street car to slow up: Girard Coll. P.R.R. v. Middleton, 3 W.N. 486. The ordinary speed of a car ought to be checked at every street crossing. The driver should be looking before him and never allow his attention to be diverted: West Phila. Pass. Ry. v. Mulhair, 6 W.N. 508. The drivers of street cars owe the same measure of duty to other passengers, as the drivers of other vehicles, subject only to the limitation under which they are placed by the fact of their running on the tracks: Unger v. 42d Street R.R., 51 N.Y. 497; Pendleton St. Ry. Co. v. Shires, 18...

To continue reading

Request your trial
21 cases
  • Timler v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Supreme Court
    • 19 Marzo 1906
    ... ... Appeal, No. 172, Jan. T., 1905, by plaintiff, from judgment ... of C.P. No. 5, Phila. Co., June T., 1903, No. 4,463, on ... verdict for defendant in case of Herman Timler v ... plaintiff's horse was but nine feet away from the track ... to be crossed: Hamilton v. Traction Co., 201 Pa ... 351; Callahan v. Phila. Traction, 184 Pa. 425 ... The ... learned ... Ry. Co., 147 Pa. 219; Ehrisman v. East Harrisburg ... City Pass. Ry. Co., 150 Pa. 180; Wheelahan v ... Traction Co., 150 Pa. 187; Winter v. Ry. Co., ... 153 Pa. 26; Gilmore v. Ry. Co., 153 Pa ... ...
  • Moses v. Northwestern Pennsylvania Ry. Co.
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Supreme Court
    • 30 Junio 1917
    ... ... Gress v. Braddock & Homestead St. Ry. Co., 14 ... Pa.Super. 87; Sheetz v. United Traction Co., 49 ... Pa.Super. 177; Ehrisman v. East Harrisburg City Pass. Ry ... Co., 105 Pa. 180; ... lean forward in his seat: Pieper v. Union Traction ... Co., 202 Pa. 100; Wheelahan v. Phila. Traction ... Co., 150 Pa. 187. This was a place requiring care on ... both sides and ... ...
  • Rudgeair v. Reading Traction Co.
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Supreme Court
    • 15 Marzo 1897
    ...Traction Co., 152 Pa. 425; Gilmore v. Pass. Ry., 153 Pa. 31; Ehrisman v. East Harrisburg City Pass. Ry., 153 Pa. 180; Wheelahan v. Phila. Traction Co., 150 Pa. 187. master is not responsible for the negligence of his servant in the doing of an act not within the scope of his employment, nor......
  • Speakman v. Philadelphia & West Chester Traction Co.
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Superior Court
    • 18 Abril 1910
    ... ... Federal Street, etc., Railway ... Co., 147 Pa. 219; Ehrisman v. E. Harrisburg City ... Pass. Ry. Co., 150 Pa. 180; Wheelahan v. Phila ... Traction Co., 150 Pa. 187; Callahan v. Traction ... Co., 184 Pa. 425; Pieper v. Union Traction Co., ... 202 Pa. 100; Warner v ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT