Wheeler v. Jackson
Decision Date | 24 November 1890 |
Citation | 34 L.Ed. 659,11 S.Ct. 76,137 U.S. 245 |
Parties | WHEELER v. JACKSON, Registrar of Arrears |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
[Statement of Case from pages 245-247 intentionally omitted] J. J. Townsend, for plaintiff in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 247-249 intentionally omitted] Almet F. Jenks, for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice HARLAN, after stating the facts in the foregoing language, delivered the opinion of the court.
The question upon this writ of error is, whether certain provisions of a statute of New York passed in 1885, and relating to sales of land in the city of Brooklyn for taxes, assessments, and water-rates, are repugnant to the constitution of the United States. It arose upon a demurrer to the complaint filed by Wheeler against Jackson, as registrar of arrears of that city. The demurrer was sustained by the supreme court of the state, and the complaint dismissed. That judgment was affirmed 1885, we find that the charter of Brooklyn, passed in 1854, provided that, if any tax or assessment remained unpaid on the day specified in the published notice given by the collector of taxes, that officer should sell at public auction the property on which the tax or assessment was imposed 'for the lowest term of years for which any person will take the same, and pay the amount of such tax or assessment with the interest and expenses;' the purchaser to receive a certificate of sale, which should be noted on the original tax or assessment rolls, as well as on the abstracts kept in the collector's office. The statute directed this certificate to be recorded in the collector's office, and declared that it should constitute 'a lien upon the lands and premises therein described after the same shall have been so recorded;' and that no assignment of a certificate should have any effect until the notice of the same, with the name and residence of the assignee, was filed in the office of the collector of the district in which the lands were situated. The owner, mortgagee, occupant, or other person interested in the land, was given the right to redeem 'at any time within two years after the sale for either tax or assessment,' by paying to the collector for the use of the purchaser, 'the said purchase money, together with any other tax or assessment which the said purchaser may have paid, chargeable on said land, and which he is hereby authorized to do, provided a notice thereof has been filed in the offc e of such collector, with fifteen per cent. per annum in addition thereto, and the certificate of such collector, stating the payment, and showing what land such payment is intended to redeem, shall be evidence of such redemption.' Upon receipt of the moneys it became the duty of the collector to cause them to be refunded to the purchaser, his legal representatives, or assigns, and all proceedings in relation to the sale were to cease. If the moneys were not paid according to the exigency of the notice, the collector was required to execute a conveyance of the property so sold. The statute contained this further provision: Laws N. Y. 1854, pp. 871, 878-881, c. 384, §§ 24, 26, 29, 30, 33, tit. 5, 'Of the collection of taxes and assessments.'
An amended charter of Brooklyn, passed June 28, 1873, repealed all former acts inconsistent with its provisions, and created for that city the department of arrears, with a chief officer, named the registrar of arrears, upon whom were imposed all the duties theretofore required to be performed by any city officer of department in relation to advertising, selling, and leasing property for assessments, taxes, and water-rates, and for the redemption of property sold therefor. Laws N. Y. 1873, pp. 1318, c. 863, tit. 8, § 1. Sections 24, 26, 29, 30, and 33 of the act of 1854 were substantially re-enacted in sections 1, 3, 5, 6, 8, and 10 of that of 1873. The differences between the two acts do not affect the present controversy.
An act of June 6, 1885, amended that of 1873. The constitutionality of the fifteenth section of the former act is questioned in this case. That section is as follows:
Laws N. Y. 1885, c. 405, § 15, p. 702.
The complaint shows that at divers times between September 22, 1856, and May 25, 1873, inclusive, at public auction held by the proper officer of Brooklyn, pursuant to the above act of 1854, and the acts amendatory thereof, the plaintiff Wheeler purchased, each for a term of years, 1,253 different lots that were sold for the non-payment of taxes, assessments, and water-rates, and paid for each the amount set opposite its number, as specified in a schedule filed with the complaint, receiving from the collector a certificate of sale of each lot. Each certificate declared that he was entitled, after the expiration of two years from its date, to a lease of the lot mentioned for a named term of years, unless the premises were sooner redeemed. The total amount of those purchases was $28,516.69.
The complaint also shows that at divers times, from September 29, 1874, to February 23, 1875, inclusive, at public auction held by the registrar of arrears of Brooklyn, for like purposes, pursuant to the act of 1873, and the acts amendatory thereof, the plaintiff purchased, each for a term of years, 61 different lots sold for the nonpayment of taxes, assessments, and water-rates, paying for each the sum specified in a schedule filed with the complaint, and receiving from the registrar...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Lamb v. Powder River Live Stock Co.
... ... effective ( Keyser v. Lowell, 54 C.C.A. 574, 578, ... 580, 117 F. 400, 404, 406; Jackson v. Lamphire, 3 ... Pet. 280, 290, 7 L.Ed. 679; Hawkins v. Barney, 5 ... Pet. 457, 466, 8 L.Ed. 190; Bronson v. Kinzie, 1 ... How. 311, 316, ... Vance, 108 U.S. 514, 2 Sup.Ct. 854, 27 ... L.Ed. 808; McGahey v. Virginia, 135 U.S. 662, 707, ... 10 Sup.Ct. 972, 34 L.Ed. 304; Wheeler v. Jackson, ... 137 U.S. 245, 255, 11 Sup.Ct. 76, 34 L.Ed. 659; Turner v ... New York, 168 U.S. 90, 94, 18 Sup.Ct. 38, 42 L.Ed. 392; ... ...
-
Flippin v. Jarrell
...effect. Atchafalaya Land Co. v. F. B. Williams Cypress Co., 258 U.S. 190, 42 S.Ct. 284, 66 L.Ed. 559 (1922); Wheeler v. Jackson, 137 U.S. 245, 11 S.Ct. 76, 34 L.Ed. 659 (1890); Saranac Land Company v. Comptroller, 177 U.S. 318, 20 S.Ct. 642, 44 L.Ed.2d 786 (1899); Turner v. New York, supra,......
-
Fields v. Legacy Health System
...a reasonable time, under all the circumstances, to bring suit before the bar takes effect. See, e.g., Wheeler v. Jackson, 137 U.S. 245, 255-58, 11 S.Ct. 76, 34 L.Ed. 659 (1890) (holding that statute authorizing cancellation of realty sales records where purchaser failed to compel conveyance......
-
E. J. Lander & Co. v. Deemy
... ... questions. See 39 Cyc. 1369; Monsen v. Stevens, 56 ... Ill. 335; Wilburn v. Haines, 53 Ill. 207; ... Jackson v. Warren, 32 Ill. 331; Leach v ... Ritzke, 86 Ill.App. 483; Clark v. Bourgeois, 86 ... Miss. 1, 38 So. 187; Moak v. Bryant, 51 Miss. 560; ... within which to commence actions before the act takes effect ... Hawkins v. Barney, 5 Pet. 457, 8 L.Ed. 190; ... Wheeler v. Jackson, 137 U.S. 245, 34 L.Ed. 659, 11 ... S.Ct. 76; Turner v. New York, 168 U.S. 90, 42 L.Ed ... 392, 18 S.Ct. 38; McCracken v. Hayward, ... ...