Wheeler v. Standard Steel Co.
Decision Date | 11 May 1916 |
Docket Number | 7 Div. 761 |
Citation | 196 Ala. 634,72 So. 254 |
Parties | WHEELER v. STANDARD STEEL CO. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Rehearing Denied June 30, 1916
Appeal from City of Gadsden; John H. Disque, Judge.
Action by Fred F. Wheeler against the Standard Steel Company. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.
W.J Boykin and J.M. Miller, both of Gadsden, for appellant.
Hood & Murphree, of Gadsden, for appellee.
Suit by appellant against appellee for the recovery of damages for personal injuries, sustained by plaintiff while in the employment of defendant, and while in the performance of the duties of such employment.
Upon the conclusion of all the evidence in the case, the trial court gave the affirmative charge requested by the defendant with hypothesis. This is the only question argued by counsel for appellant on this appeal. In brief of counsel for appellee there appears a very orderly and succinct statement of the most pertinent facts in the case, the correctness of which statement is not questioned by counsel for appellant in their brief filed in reply thereto; and, after a careful examination of the record, we have concluded to adopt this statement in this opinion. Counsel's statement of the facts is as follows:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Morgan Hill Paving Co. v. Fonville
... ... 729; Robinson Co. v. Swiney, 206 ... Ala. 617, 91 So. 476; Jefferson v. Republic Iron & Steel ... Co., 208 Ala. 143, 93 So. 890; Reed v. Ridout's ... Ambulance, Inc., 212 Ala. 428, 102 So ... Pac. Ry. Co. v. Columbia, 65 Kan ... 390, 69 P. 338, 58 L.R.A. 399. See, also, Wheeler v ... Standard Steel Co., 196 Ala. 634, 72 So. 254; ... Whiteman v. M. & O.R. Co., 217 Ala ... ...
-
City of Birmingham v. Latham
... ... to some of our approved definitions. In Wheeler v ... Standard Steel Co., 196 Ala. 634, 72 So. 254, 256, it ... was observed: "Upon the question ... ...
-
Vaughn v. Dwight Mfg. Co.
...194, 11 So. 894, 21 L. R. A. 316, 38 Am. St. Rep. 179; Armstrong v. Montgomery Street Railway, 123 Ala. 233, 249, 26 So. 349; Wheeler v. Standard Steel Co., supra; Garrett v. L. & N., 196 Ala. 52, 71 So. Allen v. Alger-Sullivan Lbr. Co., 204 Ala. 92, 85 So. 278; Id., 205 Ala. 352, 87 So. 44......
-
Dwight Mfg. Co. v. Vaughn
... ... Co. v. Mutch, ... 97 Ala. 194, 11 So. 894, 21 L.R.A. 316, 38 Am.St.Rep. 179; ... Wheeler v. Standard Steel Co., 196 Ala. 634, 72 So ... 254; Garrett v. L. & N.R.R. Co., 196 Ala. 52, 71 ... ...