Wheeling & L.E.R. Co. v. Carpenter
Decision Date | 06 November 1914 |
Docket Number | 2426. |
Citation | 218 F. 273 |
Parties | WHEELING & L.E.R. CO. et al. v. CARPENTER et al. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit |
The Wheeling & Lake Erie Railway Company, a corporation of Ohio owning a large part of the stock of the Wheeling, Lake Erie & Pittsburgh Coal Company, a corporation of Ohio, controlled it as a subsidiary company, and through it had carried on the business of mining coal. Both were in the hands of the same receivers. The railway company was reorganized in 1900, under the name of the Wheeling & Lake Erie Railroad Company, a corporation of Ohio. The lands of the coal company containing coal mines, were adjacent to the railroad, which furnished the coal's only outlet. The receivers operated the coal mines. M. A. Hanna & Co. were sales agents for the receivers, and continued as such until January, 1902. There were outstanding against the coal lands a mortgage made by the coal company securing something less than $1,000,000 of bonds, and receivers' certificates and other debts prior to the bonds, the exact amount of which does not clearly appear.
January 25, 1897, an agreement providing for a complete plan of reorganization of the coal company was made between a committee of the bondholders, the Mercantile Trust Company and such bondholders as might deposit their bonds with the trust company for the purpose. April 11, 1900, the bondholders' committee submitted to the bondholders a plan of reorganization, and with it a circular of date April 19, 1900, prepared after consultation with representatives of bondholders and 'various interests concerned.' These interests were M. A. Hanna & Co., who were selling the coal mined by the receivers, and the railroad company, which controlled the mines and transported the coal.
The committee advised the bondholders of their belief that they had devised a method by which the necessary moneys could be raised and the future of the company made secure, which should be satisfactory to all the bondholders. The information in the circular to that end was:
It was further said in the circular:
'In consideration of the large contribution to be made by the railroad company to the amount necessary to pay the receivers' obligations and the expenses of foreclosure and reorganization, the total of which it is estimated will be from $175,000 to $180,000, the capital stock of the new company, except so much of it as the committee in its discretion shall see fit to use in discharging the floating debt of the coal company, is to be turned over to the railroad company.
The expected minimum income of the new company under the proposed lease is . . . $45,500 00
The interest on the proposed new bonds, $634,500, at 4 per cent. . . . $25,380 00
The amount for sinking fund . . . 10,000 00
Estimated amount for taxes, etc. . . . 7,000 00 42,380 00
Surplus . . . $ 3,120 00
The plan, of great length and amplification of detail, was, in substance, that the foreclosure of the mortgage be brought about; the property bought in for the bondholders and paid for by the bonds pro tanto; a new corporation organized under the name of the Pittsburgh, Wheeling & Lake Erie Coal Company to take over the property; the issue of prior lien obligations at 5 per cent., maturing in 10 years, due July 1, 1911, not to exceed $200,000, to discharge obligations prior to the bonds, and $634,000 in mortgage bonds at 4 per cent. payable semiannually, due in 30 years from date, subject to the prior lien obligations, and $1,250,000 in stock. The provisions for the payment of prior lien obligations were:
Provision was made for securing the prior lien obligations and bonds by mortgage; the right of enforcing the security to be given to the holders of either class of obligations; the mortgage to provide also for the establishment of a sinking fund from the earnings of the new company of $10,000 annually, which was to be used in the purchase of additional coal lands, or in the purchase and retirement of the bonds on allotment. The committee in their discretion were to use the preferred stock in settling prior claims, and any of such stock not so used and all the common stock were to be delivered to the railroad company in consideration of the contribution agreement 'based upon the amount of coal produced by the new company and transported by the said railroad company upon or over its railroad.'
The minutes of the reorganization committee of a meeting at New York August 16, 1901, show that all the outstanding bonds had been deposited with the committee, except 2; that the mortgage upon the property of the Wheeling, Lake Erie & Pittsburgh Coal Company had been foreclosed, and the same had been purchased on behalf of the committee for the upset price of $350,000 and the assumption of the receivers' liabilities; that a new company had been formed in Ohio, to be called the Pittsburgh, Wheeling & Lake Erie Coal Company, and that the papers had all been prepared for the transfer of the property so purchased on behalf of the committee to the new coal company; that a mortgage by the new company to the Mercantile Trust Company, to secure the bonds and prior lien obligations, was to be made under the plan of reorganization; that a lease of the mine had been agreed upon to the Wheeling & Lake Erie Coal Mining Company, guaranteed by M. A. Hanna & Co., on a royalty of 6 1/2 cents a ton, the lessee agreeing to pay on not less than 700,000 tons each year; that an agreement had also been entered into between the new company and the Wheeling & Lake Erie Railroad Company for a contribution to be made by the latter upon each ton of coal transported by the railroad, in accordance with the terms of the plan; that these papers had not yet been delivered, awaiting the completion of another agreement between the railroad company and the Wheeling & Lake Erie Coal Mining Company, which latter agreement was expected to be consummated the present week. (This agreement was for fuel coal.)
Thereupon it was resolved, among other things, in substance, that the chairman cause to have completed and delivered the necessary papers to carry out the transfer of the property to the Pittsburgh, Wheeling & Lake Erie Coal Company, theretofore formed, and to receive from it the prior lien obligations, bonds, and stock pursuant to the plan. And from the minutes it appears further:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Zahn v. Transamerica Corporation
...Valley Transit Co. v. Zanes, 3 Cir., 46 F.2d 848; Jones v. Missouri-Edison Electric Co., 8 Cir., 144 F. 765; Wheeling & Lake Erie R. Co. v. Carpenter, 6 Cir., 218 F. 273; Board of Highway Commissioners v. Bloomington, 253 Ill. 164, 97 N.E. 280, Ann.Cas.1913A, 471; Dowling v. Charleston & W.......
-
Duplan Corp. v. Deering Milliken, Inc.
...terms of the obligation. Sacramento Navigation Company v. Salz, 273 U.S. 326, 329 47 S.Ct. 368, 71 L.Ed. 663; Wheeling & L. E. R. Company v. Carpenter, 218 F. 273 (CCA 6)." Baldwin Rubber Company v. Paine & Williams Company, 107 F.2d 350, 353 (6th Cir. Plaintiffs cite the intermediate sales......
-
Lebold v. Inland Steel Co., 7578.
...Valley Transit Co. v. Zanes, 3 Cir., 46 F.2d 848; Jones v. Missouri-Edison Electric Co., 8 Cir., 144 F. 765; Wheeler & Lake Erie R. R. Co. v. Carpenter, 6 Cir., 218 F. 273; Board of Highway Commissioners v. Bloomington, 253 Ill. 164, 97 N.E. 280, Ann. Cas.1913A, 471; Dowling v. Charleston &......
-
Tennessee Consol. Coal Co. v. Home Ice & Coal Co.
... ... principal authority cited for these statements is New ... York Trust Co. et al. v. Carpenter et al., 6 Cir., 250 ... F. 668, known as the "Third Carpenter Case." That ... case is ... these bondholders in the "First Carpenter Case" ... Wheeling & Lake Erie R. Co. v. Carpenter, 6 Cir., 218 F. 273, ... and in the "Second Carpenter Case" Baker ... ...