White v. Logan, 310
Decision Date | 20 October 1954 |
Docket Number | No. 310,310 |
Citation | 240 N.C. 791,83 S.E.2d 892 |
Parties | Jim WHITE v. H. A. LOGAN, Jr. |
Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
Horace Kennedy, Shelby, for plaintiffappellant.
No counsel contra.
It is well settled that the plea of payment is an affirmative one, and the general rule is that the burden of showing payment must be assumed by the party interposing it. Davis v. Dockery, 209 N.C. 272, 183 S.E. 396; Furst v. Taylor, 204 N.C. 603, 169 S.E. 185; Collins v. Vandiford, 196 N.C. 237, 145 S.E. 235; Swan v. Carawan, 168 N.C. 472, 84 S.E. 699. See also Joyce v. Sell, 233 N.C. 585, 64 S.E.2d 837; 8 Am.Jur., Bills and Notes, Sec. 1035; 40 Am.Jur., Payment, Sec. 278. The burden of proof is a substantial right. Davis v. Dockery, supra; Collins v. Vandiford, supra.
Here the defendant's plea of payment cast on him the burden of proving the affirmative of the issue thus raised However, the trial court inadvertently placed the burden of proof on the plaintiff. This entitles the plaintiff to a new trial
New Trial.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Thompson v. Seaboard Air Line R. Co.
...v. Newberry, 140 N.C. 385, 53 S.E. 234 (accord and satisfaction); Rountree v. Brinson, 98 N.C. 107, 3 S.E. 747 (usury); White v. Logan, 240 N.C. 791, 83 S.E.2d 892 It is manifest that the answer to section 7 of the complaint where the wrongful change of grade is alleged is nothing more than......
-
Mills Int'l, Inc. v. Archie Randall Holmes & Holmes Agribiz, Inc. (In re Mills Int'l, Inc.)
...assumed by the party interposing it." Auto Finance Co. v. McDonald , 249 N.C. 72, 105 S.E.2d 193, 194 (1958) (quoting White v. Logan , 240 N.C. 791, 83 S.E.2d 892 (1954) ). The Defendants' defense of payment has no merit.Statute of Frauds 76. Holmes never signed any document that specified ......
-
General Tire & Rubber Co. v. Distributors, Inc.
...rests on the party who asserts the affirmative thereof * * *.' Strong: N.C. Index, Vol. 2, Evidence, § 5, pp. 248-9. White v. Logan, 240 N.C. 791, 792, 83 S.E.2d 892; Benner v. Phipps, 214 N.C. 14, 15, 197 S.E. There must be a new trial. Ordinarily we do not chart the course of the retrial.......
- Moss v. Hicks