White v. Logan, 310

Decision Date20 October 1954
Docket NumberNo. 310,310
Citation240 N.C. 791,83 S.E.2d 892
PartiesJim WHITE v. H. A. LOGAN, Jr.
CourtNorth Carolina Supreme Court

Horace Kennedy, Shelby, for plaintiffappellant.

No counsel contra.

JOHNSON, Justice.

It is well settled that the plea of payment is an affirmative one, and the general rule is that the burden of showing payment must be assumed by the party interposing it. Davis v. Dockery, 209 N.C. 272, 183 S.E. 396; Furst v. Taylor, 204 N.C. 603, 169 S.E. 185; Collins v. Vandiford, 196 N.C. 237, 145 S.E. 235; Swan v. Carawan, 168 N.C. 472, 84 S.E. 699. See also Joyce v. Sell, 233 N.C. 585, 64 S.E.2d 837; 8 Am.Jur., Bills and Notes, Sec. 1035; 40 Am.Jur., Payment, Sec. 278. The burden of proof is a substantial right. Davis v. Dockery, supra; Collins v. Vandiford, supra.

Here the defendant's plea of payment cast on him the burden of proving the affirmative of the issue thus raised However, the trial court inadvertently placed the burden of proof on the plaintiff. This entitles the plaintiff to a new trial

New Trial.

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Thompson v. Seaboard Air Line R. Co.
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • June 30, 1958
    ...v. Newberry, 140 N.C. 385, 53 S.E. 234 (accord and satisfaction); Rountree v. Brinson, 98 N.C. 107, 3 S.E. 747 (usury); White v. Logan, 240 N.C. 791, 83 S.E.2d 892 It is manifest that the answer to section 7 of the complaint where the wrongful change of grade is alleged is nothing more than......
  • Mills Int'l, Inc. v. Archie Randall Holmes & Holmes Agribiz, Inc. (In re Mills Int'l, Inc.)
    • United States
    • U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Eastern District of North Carolina
    • March 15, 2017
    ...assumed by the party interposing it." Auto Finance Co. v. McDonald , 249 N.C. 72, 105 S.E.2d 193, 194 (1958) (quoting White v. Logan , 240 N.C. 791, 83 S.E.2d 892 (1954) ). The Defendants' defense of payment has no merit.Statute of Frauds 76. Holmes never signed any document that specified ......
  • General Tire & Rubber Co. v. Distributors, Inc.
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • December 14, 1960
    ...rests on the party who asserts the affirmative thereof * * *.' Strong: N.C. Index, Vol. 2, Evidence, § 5, pp. 248-9. White v. Logan, 240 N.C. 791, 792, 83 S.E.2d 892; Benner v. Phipps, 214 N.C. 14, 15, 197 S.E. There must be a new trial. Ordinarily we do not chart the course of the retrial.......
  • Moss v. Hicks
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • October 20, 1954
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT