White v. Northern Mich. Reg'l Hosp.
Citation | 698 F.Supp.2d 950 |
Decision Date | 22 March 2010 |
Docket Number | Case No. 1:08-cv-734. |
Parties | Melissa WHITE, Plaintiff,v.NORTHERN MICHIGAN REGIONAL HOSPITAL, Defendant. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Western District of Michigan |
Julie A. Gafkay, Katherine Sue Gardner, Law Office of Julie A. Gafkay PLC, Frankenmuth, MI, for Plaintiff.
Maureen Rouse-Ayoub, Bodman LLP, Detroit, MI, for Defendant.
Denying the Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration of 659 F.Supp.2d 858 (W.D.Mich.2009) ( );
Surgical technician Melissa White brought this pregnancy-discrimination action against her former employer, Northern Michigan Regional Hospital (“the hospital”) under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., as amended by the Pregnancy Discrimination Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e(k). White also asserted pendent claims for sex and pregnancy discrimination and retaliation under Michigan's Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act. White began working for the hospital as an at-will employee in September 2007, subject to a probationary period during which she was not eligible for vacation or progressive discipline procedures. The parties agreed that White informed the hospital that she was pregnant on October 1, 2007, and her employment ended on December 19, 2007, towards the end of her probationary period. The hospital moved to dismiss on the ground that White failed to exhaust her administrative remedies. In the alternative, the hospital moved for summary judgment on the ground inter alia, that White could not show a genuine issue of material fact as to some of the elements of a prima facie case of pregnancy discrimination. After hearing oral argument in September 2009, the court dismissed the Title VII claim without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies, and declined supplemental jurisdiction over the state-law claims. See White v. Northern Michigan Hospital, 659 F.Supp.2d 858 (W.D.Mich.2009) (Maloney, C.J.).
White is 25 years old and has earned two Associate's degrees from Mott Community College and a Surgical Technician Certification from Northern Michigan University White, 659 F.Supp.2d at 859. White was hired on a probationary basis as an entry-level Surgical Technologist I for the hospital in Petoskey, Michigan. She was employed in that capacity from September 17, 2007 until her termination on December 19, 2007. Her job was to assist physicians during surgery. She acknowledges that a surgical tech's schedule is based on the surgeries being performed at the hospital, which therefore needs sufficient staff available at the time each surgery is scheduled id. The position was White's first following graduation and, like other new employees at the hospital, she was subject to a 180-day probationary period, during which she was ineligible for time off or progressive discipline procedures id. at 859. White understood that the training was important and that the hospital spent significant money and staff time to prepare new Surgical Techs for the transition to a regular surgical schedule. She also understood that her supervisor, Jeanette Rockwell, was concerned about her inconsistent attendance because Rockwell was responsible for scheduling surgical techs in the ORs and the hospital needed White to be present and doing her job id. at 860.
The training required White to rotate through each OR surgical speciality-general/vascular, urology/gynecology, ENT/plastics, neurosurgery, and orthopedics-during which she was observed and supervised by more-experienced surgical techs called preceptors, who provided feedback and evaluations; they submitted weekly progress reports, which Education Coordinator Rockwell reviewed with White and the other probationary employees, id. at 861. White presented progress reports which she characterizes as praising her performance and attitude throughout September, October and November, primarily September. The court reproduced those evaluations, and other evaluations submitted by defendant NMH, at length, id. at 862-63.
Rockwell oversaw the orientation program for new surgical techs, meeting with them, bringing mistakes to their attention, inspecting surgical suites, observing surgeries, and stopping techs in the hallway to discuss issues and point out errors. White testified that she has no reason to believe that Rockwell did not point out errors to other new surgical techs, id. at 863.
On October 1, 2007, upon hearing the news that White was pregnant, department manager Kathleen English allegedly said to her, “This is just what we need.” Id. at 863. White alleges that thereafter, her supervisors subjected her to greater scrutiny and increasingly criticized her performance, e.g., Rockwell was constantly watching her through the OR windows. Unspecified supervisors allegedly made comments such as “you need to manage your pregnancy better.” Id.
The remainder of the factual background is set forth at White, 659 F.Supp.2d at 863-69 ( ).
The hospital moved for summary judgment in June 2009, and in July 2009 White filed an opposition brief and the hospital filed a reply brief. In August 2009, as directed by the court, the hospital filed a supplemental reply brief further developing its contention that the complaint should be dismissed for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. White did not file a response to the supplemental reply or seek an extension of time in which to do so. This court dismissed White's complaint for failure to properly exhaust administrative remedies. White seeks reconsideration.
In the ruling which White seeks to reconsider, this court reasoned as follows with regard to the Title VII claim:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Ramirez v. Bolster & Jeffries Health Care Grp., LLC
...to act " ‘as an efficient conciliator’, which is ‘central to Title VII's statutory scheme.’ " White v. Northern Mich. Regional Hosp. , 698 F.Supp.2d 950, 956 (W.D.Mich. 2010) (quoting Gavette v. Brady , No. 92-2134, 1993 WL 384902, at *2 (6th Cir. Sept. 28, 1993) ). See also Shikles v. Spri......
-
Mohamed v. 1st Class Staffing, LLC
...Sixth Circuit has not addressed this issue, a handful of district courts in the Circuit have done so. In White v. N. Mich. Regional Hosp., 698 F.Supp.2d 950, 956 (W.D. Mich. 2010), plaintiff attempted to withdraw her EEOC charge and "unequivocally terminat[ed] her involvement in the EEOC ad......
-
Bolin v. Gen. Motors, LLC
...Congress intended the exhaustion requirement to serve the primary purposes of notice and conciliation." White v. N. Mich. Reg'l Hosp., 698 F. Supp. 2d 950, 961-62 (W.D. Mich. 2010) (quoting Chacko v. Patuxent Institution, 429 F.3d 505, 510 (4th Cir. 2005)). While a close call, based on the ......
-
Koutsoukos v. Case Credit Union
...Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and receive a right-to-sue letter from the EEOC. See, e.g., White v. Northern Michigan Regional Hospital, 698 F.Supp.2d 950, 957-58 (W.D. Mich. 2010). She must then initiate her action in federal court within ninety days of receiving a right-to-sue letter from ......