White v. State

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
Writing for the CourtPELHAM, P.J.
CitationWhite v. State, 72 So. 771, 15 Ala.App. 197 (Ala. App. 1916)
Decision Date07 September 1916
Docket Number8 Div. 460
PartiesWHITE v. STATE.

Appeal from Law and Equity Court, Morgan County; Thomas W. Wert Judge.

Vandy White was convicted of uttering a forged instrument, and he appeals. Affirmed.

The motions and objections noted went to the formation of the grand jury returning the indictment, and fully appear in the cases cited.

C.L Price, of New Decatur, for appellant.

William L. Martin, Atty. Gen., and Perry W. Turner, Asst. Atty. Gen for the State.

PELHAM P.J.

The recent cases of Jim Ogles v. State, 72 So. 598, and Ex parte E.M. Brown, 72 So. 772, In which opinions were rendered on August 1, 1916 (special August term, 1916), in effect dispose of the questions presented on this appeal adversely to the appellant's contention.

The motions made by the defendant seeking to reach the defect were not the proper practice, and do not present the question. Acts 1909, p. 315, § 23; Thornton v State, 4 Ala.App. 205, 59 So. 234; Swain v. State, 8 Ala.App. 28, 62 So. 446; Rector v. State, 11 Ala.App. 340, 66 So. 857.

The only objection available to the defendant against the validity of the indictment on a plea in abatement is that the jurors who found the indictment were not drawn by the officers designated by law to draw them. Other grounds set up in the plea are not available. Acts 1909, p. 315, § 23; Spivey v. State, 172 Ala. 391, 56 So. 232; Swain v. State, 8 Ala.App. 26, 62 So. 446. This ground of objection is not sustained by the proof. The minute entry recites that the jury was drawn by the judge of the court, the officer designated by law. Acts 1909, p. 310, § 15. A recital that all the jurors "had been regularly drawn according to law" is sufficient to show that the jurors were drawn by the officer designated by law. Swain v. State, 8 Ala.App. 26, 28, 62 So. 446.

The judge of the Morgan county law and equity court has all the powers conferred upon circuit judges in ordering adjournments of court, and the adjourned term being but a continuation of the regular term, the jurors may be, on appropriate order (as was shown to have been done in this case), carried over to the adjourned term at which the court may exercise all the authority and jurisdiction it could exercise at regular term. Town of Athens v. Miller, 190 ala. 88, 66 So. 702; Ogles v. State and Ex parte Brown, supra, August 1916 special term; Whatley v. State, 144...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 cases
  • Williams v. Simon
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • March 31, 1924
    ...Mississippi, 78 Miss. 250; Railway Co. v. Hand, 7 Kan. 239. The supreme court of Alabama passed directly upon this question in White v. State (Ala.), 72 So. 771. do not favor the discontinuance of terms, when once regularly begun. The supreme court of this state has held that the court is o......
  • Brown v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Appeals
    • April 3, 1917
    ...These questions have been passed upon by this court adversely to the defendant's contention. Ex parte Brown, 72 So. 772; White v. State, 72 So. 771; Ogles v. State, 72 So. 598; Dock McDaniel State, 75 So. 173. The defendant contends that section 32 of the liquor law of 1915 (Laws 1915, p. 3......
  • McDaniel v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Appeals
    • April 3, 1917
    ... ... law, and from said judgment of conviction he appeals. On the ... trial of the case, by motion and otherwise, the regularity of ... the adjourned term of the court was raised ... But the ... recent cases of Ogles v. State, [16 Ala.App. 29] 72 ... [75 So. 174.] White v. State, 72 ... So. 771, in effect dispose of defendant's objections and ... questions presented on this appeal with reference to the ... organization of the court and the regularity of the indictment ... contrary to the defendant's contentions ... The ... court did not commit ... ...
  • Johnson v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Appeals
    • September 7, 1916
  • Get Started for Free