White v. State, CR-95-2105
Decision Date | 20 December 1996 |
Docket Number | CR-95-2105 |
Citation | 695 So.2d 241 |
Parties | Roy L. WHITE II v. STATE. |
Court | Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals |
Roy L. White II, pro se.
Jeff Sessions, Atty. Gen., and Stephen N. Dodd, Asst. Atty. Gen., for Appellee.
The appellant, Roy L. White II, appeals the trial court's dismissal of his Rule 32, Ala.R.Crim.P., petition for postconviction relief challenging his September 26, 1990, conviction for murder and the trial court' order prohibiting him from filing any additional Rule 32 petitions. According to the appellant, his direct appeal was dismissed on his motion without prejudice. The appellant filed Rule 32 petitions in 1992 and 1994, which the trial court denied. The present petition was filed June 18, 1996.
The grounds for relief presented in the June 18 petition and other motions presented to the trial court are not entirely clear. The appellant is apparently alleging that he did not receive the mental examination ordered by the trial court at the time of the trial. According to the appellant, at the time of the murder and also at the time of the trial he suffered from a mental infirmity that prevented him from assisting in his defense and prevented fair trial. The appellant also asserted that he "intends to Appeal continually this 'arightly' presented case until he [is] granted an Evidentiary Hearing." C.R. 17. The State moved to dismiss the petition on procedural grounds and because it was unsupported by facts. Because the appellant vowed to continually file appeals until an evidentiary hearing is granted, the State also requested that the appellant "be barred from filing any more post-conviction relief petitions or, in the alternative, that the State be relieved from responding to any subsequent petitions." C.R. 22. The case action summary sheet reflects that the trial court granted the State's motion to deny the petition and granted the motion "to bar further postconviction relief." C.R. 1.
A circuit judge may deny a Rule 32 petition without an evidentiary hearing. Rule 32.7(d). The trial court correctly denied the present petition because it is a successive petition and is, therefore, precluded from review under Rule 32.2(b), and because it did not "contain a clear and specific statement of the grounds upon which relief [was] sought, including full disclosure of the factual basis of those grounds" as required by Rule 32.6(b).
However, we must remand this case because the trial court's order prohibiting the appellant from filing further postconviction petitions is overbroad. In Peoples v. State, 531 So.2d 323 (Ala.Cr.App.1988), Peoples filed 20 post-judgment motions after his sentencing. Our ruling in Peoples v. State, 531 So.2d 323 (Ala.Cr.App.1988), is dispositive of the issue, and we quote extensively from that opinion below.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Ex parte Coleman
...threat of onerous, multiplicitious, and baseless litigation." Abdullah v. Gatto, 773 F.2d 487, 488 (2d Cir.1985). See White v. State, 695 So.2d 241 (Ala.Cr.App.1996); Coleman v. State, 539 So.2d 454 (Ala.Cr.App.1988); and Peoples v. State, 531 So.2d 323 (Ala.Cr.App.1988). In Peoples, this C......
-
Ex parte Pritchett
..."should not be so overbroad as to deny [him] `meaningful access to the courts.'" Coleman, 728 So.2d at 708, quoting White v. State, 695 So.2d 241, 242 (Ala.Crim.App.1996). For the reasons stated above, this petition is due to be, and is hereby, granted, to the extent that Judge Bahakel is d......
-
Ex parte Magouirk
...be.' In re Oliver, 682 F.2d 443, 446 (3rd Cir.1982)." See also Ex parte Coleman, 728 So.2d 703 (Ala.Crim.App.1998) and White v. State, 695 So.2d 241 (Ala.Crim.App.1996). We conclude that Judge Gullahorn's order is overbroad and completely denies Magouirk's access to the We note that a trial......
-
Ex parte Franklin
...be.' In re Oliver, 682 F.2d 443, 446 (3rd Cir.1982)." See also Ex parte Coleman, 728 So.2d 703 (Ala.Crim.App.1998), and White v. State, 695 So.2d 241 (Ala.Crim.App.1996). Also, recently in Ex parte Magouirk, [Ms. CR-99-2423, October 27, 2000] ___ So.2d ___ (Ala.Crim.App.2000), we held that ......