White v. State, 53128

Decision Date10 November 1976
Docket NumberNo. 53128,53128
PartiesDonnie Joe WHITE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.
CourtTexas Court of Criminal Appeals
OPINION

ONION, Presiding Judge.

This proceeding apparently involves appeals from three convictions for aggravated robbery, wherein the punishment assessed was twenty (20) years.

Appellant's court-appointed counsel had filed an appellate brief in which he concluded that the appeals are frivolous and wholly without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1973), and Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex.Cr.App.1969), as interpreted in Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex.Cr.App.1974). A copy of counsel's brief has been delivered to the appellant, and the appellant has been advised of his right to inspect the appellate record and his right to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed.

We have carefully examined the record and find the appeal to be without merit as to one conviction, but conclude that we are without jurisdiction of the other two convictions, if any.

The indictment alleged three offenses of aggravated robbery in three separate counts. The first count alleged that the offense occurred on or about July 17, 1975. The second and third counts alleged those offenses occurred on or about July 19, 1975. Each count reflected different complaining witnesses.

It appears that the indictment was drafted under the provisions of V.T.C.A., Penal Code, §§ 3.01 and 3.02, and Article 21.24, Vernon's Ann.C.C.P., as amended.

Article 21.24, supra, provides in part:

'(a) Two or more offenses may be joined in a single indictment, information, or complaint, with each offense stated in a separate count, if the offense arise out of the same criminal episode, as defined in Chapter 3 of the Penal Code.'

§ 3.01 provides:

'In this chapter, 'criminal episode' means the repeated commission of any one offense defined in Title 7 of this code (Offenses Against Property).'

§ 3.02 provides in part:

'(a) A defendant may be prosecuted in a single criminal action for all offenses arising out of the same criminal episode.'

The offense of aggravated robbery is provided for in V.T.C.A., Penal Code, § 29.03, which is found in Title 7 of said code.

On October 6, 1975, prior to trial, the court inquired if the State desired to elect which count upon which it would proceed and the prosecutor answered, 'all three counts.' The appellant then entered a plea of nolo contendere and was duly and carefully admonished by the trial court in accordance with Article 26.13, Vernon's Ann.C.C.P. The evidence was in the form of written stipulations, which include written 'judicial confessions' to each of the alleged offenses. At the conclusion of the trial the court assessed punishment at twenty (20) years for 'aggravated robbery.' Whether the court intended to find the appellant guilty of all three counts or only one count is not clear from the statements found in the transcription of the court reporter's notes. The single judgment found in the record referring only to a single conviction for aggravated robbery does little to clarify the situation except that it contains a finding that the offense of aggravated robbery mentioned therein occurred on July 17, 1975. This leads to the conclusion that the conviction was based on the first count of the indictment in light of the date of the offense alleged in the first count of the indictment and the date reflected in appellant's judicial confession to the first count.

We observe further that there is only one sentence in the record which was pronounced eleven days after trial. V.T.C.A., Penal Code, § 3.03 provides:

...

To continue reading

Request your trial
17 cases
  • Drake v. State
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    • February 27, 1985
    ...appellate level and received uneven treatment in trial courts. See Faulks v. State, 528 S.W.2d 607 (Tex.Cr.App.1975); 5 White v. State, 543 S.W.2d 130 (Tex.Cr.App.1976), Jordan v. State, 552 S.W.2d 478 (Tex.Cr.App.1977); and Robinson v. State, 553 S.W.2d 371 (Tex.Cr.App.1977). On the other ......
  • Murray v. State
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • September 21, 2011
    ...was no valid judgment while simultaneously addressing merits of portion of appeal over which it had jurisdiction); White v. State, 543 S.W.2d 130, 132 (Tex.Crim.App.1976). We will consider the points of error raised by Murray in this appeal only as to the convictions for aggravated sexual a......
  • Robinson v. State
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    • July 13, 1977
    ...The single sentence referring to both counts of the indictment failed to meet the requirements of said § 3.03. In White v. State, 543 S.W.2d 130 (Tex.Cr.App.1976), there was a single sentence for three convictions of aggravated robbery arising out of the same criminal episode and prosecuted......
  • English v. State
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    • January 9, 1980
    ...error, which can be corrected. Compare the trial court's authority to correct an improper entry of its judgment. White v. State, 543 S.W.2d 130 (Tex.Cr.App.1976); Savant v. State, 535 S.W.2d 190 (Tex.Cr.App.1976). This Court pointed out in Moore v. State, 446 S.W.2d 878 (Tex.Cr.App.1969), t......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT