White v. Town of West Chicago
Decision Date | 23 November 1896 |
Citation | 45 N.E. 495,164 Ill. 196 |
Parties | WHITE et al. v. TOWN OF WEST CHICAGO. |
Court | Illinois Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Error to Cook county court; Frank Scales, Judge.
Application by the town of West Chicago for the appointment of commissioners to make and levy a special assessment for the cost of improving a boulevard. Commissioners were appointed, and, from a judgment confirming the assessment roll made by them, Mary White and others bring error. Reversed.
Geo. W. Wilbur, for plaintiffs in error.
H. S. Mecartney, for defendant in error.
The same record presented in this case has been before us on three occasions. Culver v. People, 161 Ill. 89, 43 N. E. 812;Farrell v. Town of West Chicago, 162 Ill. 280, 44 N. E. 527;Connor v. Town of West Chicago, 162 Ill. 287, 44 N. E. 1118.In the Culver Case it was decided that the ordinance upon the validity of which the judgment depended was without authority of law, and void, by reason of a provision for dividing the special assessment into installments, with interest. That decision was adopted in the other cases, and is equally conclusive in this. The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded. Reversed and remanded.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Cummings v. West Chicago Park Com'rs
...Town of West Chicago, 162 Ill. 280, 44 N. E. 527;Connor v. Town of West Chicago, 162 Ill. 287, 44 N. E. 1118; and White v. Town of West Chicago, 164 Ill. 196, 45 N. E. 495. By the decisions in those cases the proceeding was set aside and the judgment of confirmation reversed. The present pe......
-
Lombard v. West Chicago Park Commissioners
...cases. Farrell v. West Chicago, 162 Ill. 280, 44 N. E. 527; Connor v. West Chicago, 162 Ill. 287, 44 N. E. 1118; White v. West Chicago, 164 Ill. 196, 45 N. E. 495. The improvement had in the meanwhile been constructed. The West Chicago park commissioners, after the decisions in question, di......