Whitely v. Lobue
| Citation | 291 N.Y.S.2d 791,30 A.D.2d 552 |
| Parties | Roberta WHITELY et al., etc., Respondents, v. Andrew LOBUE et al., Appellants. |
| Decision Date | 13 May 1968 |
| Court | New York Supreme Court Appellate Division |
Austin & DuPont, Mineola, for plaintiffs-respondents; Clifford A. Royael, Mineola, of counsel.
Leahey & Johnson, New York City, for defendants-appellants.
Order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated September 8, 1967, which, on reargument, adhered to the original decision granting plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment (directing an assessment of damages), reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, without costs, and plaintiffs' motion denied. Appeal from order of said court dated July 31, 1967 dismissed, without costs. The order was superseded by the order dated September 8, 1967, which granted reargument. In our opinion, the issues in this action should be tried and determined by a jury (see Pfaffenbach v. White Plains Express Corp., 17 N.Y.2d 132, 269 N.Y.S.2d 132, 269 N.Y.S.2d 115; Rosenthal v. Monastra, 27 A.D.2d 749, 277 N.Y.S.2d 432; Gerard v. Inglese, 11 A.D.2d 381, 206 N.Y.S.2d 879).
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Andre v. Pomeroy
...(Slavinskas v. Clinton Warehouse, 40 A.D.2d 840, 337 N.Y.S.2d 337; Whitely v. Lobue, 59 Misc.2d 755, 300 N.Y.S.2d 907, revd. 30 A.D.2d 552, 291 N.Y.S.2d 791, revd. 24 N.Y.2d 896, 301 N.Y.S.2d 635, 249 N.E.2d 476; Gerard v. Inglese, 11 A.D.2d 381, 206 N.Y.S.2d Since I can discern not even th......
-
Ross v. Nelson
...or Admits to a clearly negligent act in the operation of a vehicle (Whitely v. LoBue, 59 Misc.2d 755, 300 N.Y.S.2d 907, rev'd 30 A.D.2d 552, 291 N.Y.S.2d 791, rev'd 24 N.Y.2d 896, 301 N.Y.S.2d 635; Opalek v. Oshrain, 33 A.D.2d 521, 305 N.Y.S.2d 675 (looked away before accident); Gerard v. I......
-
Whitely v. Lobue
...Respondents. Court of Appeals of New York. April 23, 1969. Appeal from Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, 30 A.D.2d 552, 291 N.Y.S.2d 791. Austin & DuPont, Mineola (James F. Niehoff, Mineola, of counsel), for plaintiffs-appellants. Leahey & Johnson, New York City (Asher M......
-
Hochstein v. Warner
...disbursements, payable jointly to respondents filing separate briefs. The facts herein are clearly distinguishable from Whitely v. Lo Bue, 30 A.D.2d 552, 291 N.Y.S.2d 791, revd. 24 N.Y.2d 886, 301 N.Y.S.2d 631, 249 N.E.2d 473, and thus summary judgment was properly BRENNAN, Acting P.J., and......