Whiteport v. Whiteport, 7 Div. 773

Decision Date13 March 1969
Docket Number7 Div. 773
Citation283 Ala. 704,220 So.2d 891
PartiesPaul WHITEPORT v. Mary Ann WHITEPORT.
CourtAlabama Supreme Court

Geo. D. Finley, Birmingham, for appellant.

Roy D. McCord and Rowan S. Bone, Gadsden, for appellee.

MERRILL, Justice.

The question in this case is whether the trial court erred in awarding the custody of three children, aged 7, 4 and 3 years, to their mother instead of their father, the appellant here.

In 1964, appellant filed a bill of complaint for divorce against his wife, charging her with adultery. The wife, by motion, removed the question of the custody to the Juvenile Court. A few days later, the wife's mother, intervenor Minnie Harris, filed a petition to intervene, stating that neither the husband nor the wife was 'at that time entitled to have custody of said children,' and the Juvenile Court granted to Mrs. Harris the temporary custody of the children. The wife filed a cross bill in the divorce suit, seeking a divorce on the ground of cruelty and, on April 20, 1965, the parties were divorced on the wife's charge of cruelty with no mention of custody.

Later the wife, the husband and the maternal grandmother, with whom the children were living, petitioned the circuit court, in equity, for custody of the children, and after a hearing, the court, on January 10, 1967, decreed:

'1. That the care, custody and control of the minor children of the parties, to-wit: Sue Lynn Whiteport, Paula Whiteport and Ronald Whiteport, is hereby awarded to the Defendant, Mary Ann Whiteport, so long as said children are kept at the home of their maternal grandparents, A. J. Harris and Minnie V. Harris, and the Plaintiff, Paul Whiteport, is given custody of said minor children on alternate weekends between the hours of 9:00 a.m. on Saturday and 5:00 p.m. on Sunday, beginning January 14, 1967, and on alternate weekends thereafter pending further orders of this Court; the Defendant, Mary Ann Whiteport, is hereby ordered and directed to be responsible for the delivery of said minor children to the home of the Plaintiff at 9:00 a.m. on Saturdays and the Plaintiff, Paul Whiteport, is ordered and directed to deliver said minor children to the home of the maternal grandparents at 5:00 p.m. on Sundays each alternate weekend after having had custody of said minor children; and the Plaintiff shall further have custody of said minor children for a period of one month during the summer months, said custody to begin on July 1st and end on July 31st of each year.

'2. The Plaintiff, Paul Whiteport, is hereby ordered and directed to pay to the Defendant, Mary Ann Whiteport, the sum of $25.00 per week as support for said minor children, said support to be paid to Mary Nell Thornton, Register of the Circuit Court of Etowah County, Alabama, in Equity, Beginning January 16, 1967, and a like sum on Monday of each week thereafter, save and except the month of July when the Plaintiff has care, custody and control of said minor children.'

A petition for rehearing was set for hearing and denied without modification on February 3, 1967.

The appeal...

To continue reading

Request your trial
27 cases
  • Self v. Self
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Civil Appeals
    • March 28, 1973
    ...court, Butler v. Butler, 274 Ala. 352, 148 So.2d 638, as is the amount to be paid for the support of the children, Whiteport v. Whiteport, 283 Ala. 704, 220 So.2d 891, and the exercise of such discretion will not be revised on appeal unless the court is deened to be palpably in error. Davis......
  • Hamaker v. Hamaker
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Civil Appeals
    • December 31, 1975
    ...application for rehearing in an equity case which did not modify the original decree could not be reviewed on appeal, Whiteport v. Whiteport, 283 Ala. 704, 220 So.2d 891. This equity rule, along with the other equity rules, was superceded by the Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure. What was fo......
  • Stilwell v. Stilwell
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Civil Appeals
    • April 5, 1978
    ...court, Butler v. Butler, 274 Ala. 352, 148 So.2d 638, as is the amount to be paid for the support of the children, Whiteport v. Whiteport, 283 Ala. 704, 220 So.2d 891, and the exercise of such discretion will not be revised on appeal unless the court is deemed to be palpably in error. Davis......
  • Tcherneshoff v. Tcherneshoff
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • March 13, 1969
    ... ... 700 ... John K. TCHERNESHOFF ... Sara TCHERNESHOFF ... 7 Div. 807 ... Supreme Court of Alabama ... March 13, 1969 ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT