Whiteport v. Whiteport, 7 Div. 773
Decision Date | 13 March 1969 |
Docket Number | 7 Div. 773 |
Citation | 283 Ala. 704,220 So.2d 891 |
Parties | Paul WHITEPORT v. Mary Ann WHITEPORT. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Geo. D. Finley, Birmingham, for appellant.
Roy D. McCord and Rowan S. Bone, Gadsden, for appellee.
The question in this case is whether the trial court erred in awarding the custody of three children, aged 7, 4 and 3 years, to their mother instead of their father, the appellant here.
In 1964, appellant filed a bill of complaint for divorce against his wife, charging her with adultery. The wife, by motion, removed the question of the custody to the Juvenile Court. A few days later, the wife's mother, intervenor Minnie Harris, filed a petition to intervene, stating that neither the husband nor the wife was 'at that time entitled to have custody of said children,' and the Juvenile Court granted to Mrs. Harris the temporary custody of the children. The wife filed a cross bill in the divorce suit, seeking a divorce on the ground of cruelty and, on April 20, 1965, the parties were divorced on the wife's charge of cruelty with no mention of custody.
Later the wife, the husband and the maternal grandmother, with whom the children were living, petitioned the circuit court, in equity, for custody of the children, and after a hearing, the court, on January 10, 1967, decreed:
A petition for rehearing was set for hearing and denied without modification on February 3, 1967.
The appeal...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Self v. Self
...court, Butler v. Butler, 274 Ala. 352, 148 So.2d 638, as is the amount to be paid for the support of the children, Whiteport v. Whiteport, 283 Ala. 704, 220 So.2d 891, and the exercise of such discretion will not be revised on appeal unless the court is deened to be palpably in error. Davis......
-
Hamaker v. Hamaker
...application for rehearing in an equity case which did not modify the original decree could not be reviewed on appeal, Whiteport v. Whiteport, 283 Ala. 704, 220 So.2d 891. This equity rule, along with the other equity rules, was superceded by the Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure. What was fo......
-
Stilwell v. Stilwell
...court, Butler v. Butler, 274 Ala. 352, 148 So.2d 638, as is the amount to be paid for the support of the children, Whiteport v. Whiteport, 283 Ala. 704, 220 So.2d 891, and the exercise of such discretion will not be revised on appeal unless the court is deemed to be palpably in error. Davis......
-
Tcherneshoff v. Tcherneshoff
... ... 700 ... John K. TCHERNESHOFF ... Sara TCHERNESHOFF ... 7 Div. 807 ... Supreme Court of Alabama ... March 13, 1969 ... ...