WHITFIELD v. CITY BUS LINES, No. 5034
Docket Nº | No. 5034 |
Citation | 187 P.2d 947, 51 N.M. 434 |
Case Date | December 09, 1947 |
Court | Supreme Court of New Mexico |
187 P.2d 947
WHITFIELD et al.
v.
CITY BUS LINES, Inc., et al.
No. 5034.
Supreme Court of New Mexico.
Dec. 9, 1947.
George A. Shipley, of Alamogordo, and Donovan Hoover, of Santa Fe, for appellants.
J. B. Newell and Edwin Mechem, both of Las Cruces, Bert Newland, of Deming, and H. A. Kiker, of Santa Fe, for appellees.
C. C. McCulloh, Atty. Gen., and Robert V. Wollard, Asst. Atty. Gen., amici curiae.
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of appellees' motion for rehearing, we have withdrawn the original opinion and substituted the following as the opinion of the court.
COMPTON, Justice.
Appellants and others instituted this proceeding to restrain appellees from unlawfully engaging in the business of transporting passengers for hire over routes covered by appellants. From an adverse judgment
Appellants asserted that they were operating local passenger service by means of motor busses between Las Cruces, State College, Mesilla Park and Mesilla, in Dona
By a general denial, issue was joined. At the conclusion of the trial the court made its findings of fact and conclusions of law, except those deemed unnecessary to a decision, as follows:
'1. The plaintiffs W. E. Whitfield, Jr., Hugh C. Whitfield and Mary E. Whitfield, individually and as joint executors of the estate of W. E. Whitfield, deceased, at all times material were and now are engaged in the transportation business under the style of 'W. E. Whitfield and Sons,' and in the operation of said business are the holders of a certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity, duly issued by the State Corporation Commission of the State of New Mexico, authorizing the transportation of passengers for hire between Las Cruces in Dona Ana County, New Mexico, and Mesilla (commonly known as Old Mesilla), Mesilla Park, and State College, all in said county, over U. S. Highway No. 80, State Road No. 28 and State College Road.'
'2. At all of the times material hereto the said W. E. Whitfield and Sons have been and now are engaged in the business of transporting passengers for hire to and fro between Las Cruces, Mesilla (commonly known as Old Mesilla), Mesilla Park and State College, all in Dona Ana County, New Mexico, by means of motor buses.'
'4. The defendants, C. G. Newland, Jesse B. Lydick and Robert Y. McMillin, at all of the times material hereto, since about the 3rd of September, 1946 and until restrained from so doing, by preliminary injunction herein, have been engaged in the transportation of passengers for hire, under the style of 'City Bus Lines,' by means of motor vehicles or motor buses, to and fro between Las Cruces, Mesilla, (commonly
'5. The defendants Newland, Lydick and McMillin have not been granted Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity by the Corporation Commission of New Mexico and are not holders nor in possession of any Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity authorizing them or permitting them to transport passengers for hire over the public highways of the State of New Mexico between Las Cruces, Mesilla Park and State College.'
'10. That at the time of the institution of this suit and prior thereto the defendants, Jesse B. Lydick, C. G. Newland and Robert Y. McMillin, were engaged in operating passenger buses for hire over a route lying partly within...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Metropolitan Development and Hous. v. Eaton
...opposite party. Authorities supporting this rule are assembled in the annotations in 130 ALR 440, et seq." Whitfield v. City Bus Lines, 51 N.M. 434, 187 P.2d 947, 950 The power of eminent domain as granted to housing authorities under Chapter 20, Section 11 of the Public Acts of 1935 (E.S.)......
-
Baca v. Bueno Foods, No. 10542
...statute, it is unnecessary to do so, such being matters of defense to be raised by the opposite party. Whitfield v. City Bus Lines, Inc., 51 N.M. 434, 438, 187 P.2d 947, 950 (1947). See Page 1337 [108 N.M. 103] Annotation, Burden of Allegation and Proof in Civil Cases as Regards Exception i......
-
BRITT v. COLLUM, No. 5056
...amended where testimony not admissible under the pleadings was admitted without objection, but we are hardly prepared to hold that when51 N.M. 434tested by a motion to dismiss a plaintiff may aid his complaint by a tender of testimony. The assignments of error relate to the refusal of the c......
-
Metropolitan Development and Hous. v. Eaton
...opposite party. Authorities supporting this rule are assembled in the annotations in 130 ALR 440, et seq." Whitfield v. City Bus Lines, 51 N.M. 434, 187 P.2d 947, 950 The power of eminent domain as granted to housing authorities under Chapter 20, Section 11 of the Public Acts of 1935 (E.S.)......
-
Baca v. Bueno Foods, No. 10542
...statute, it is unnecessary to do so, such being matters of defense to be raised by the opposite party. Whitfield v. City Bus Lines, Inc., 51 N.M. 434, 438, 187 P.2d 947, 950 (1947). See Page 1337 [108 N.M. 103] Annotation, Burden of Allegation and Proof in Civil Cases as Regards Exception i......
-
BRITT v. COLLUM, No. 5056
...amended where testimony not admissible under the pleadings was admitted without objection, but we are hardly prepared to hold that when51 N.M. 434tested by a motion to dismiss a plaintiff may aid his complaint by a tender of testimony. The assignments of error relate to the refusal of the c......